Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
sort vs reduce
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
sort vs reduce
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a=Array.from({length:100},()=>Math.random())
Tests:
sort
var b = a.slice(); b.sort();
reduce
a.reduce((a,c) => a < c ? a : c)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
sort
reduce
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
10 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:139.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/139.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 139 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
sort
113055.8 Ops/sec
reduce
5547264.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: sorting an array using the `sort()` method and reducing an array to find its minimum value using the `reduce()` method. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Sort**: This involves calling the `sort()` method on the original array (`a`) to sort it in ascending order. 2. **Reduce**: This involves using the `reduce()` method to iterate through the array and find the smallest value. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Sort:** Pros: * Simple and straightforward implementation * Well-documented and widely supported Cons: * Can be slow for large datasets due to its O(n log n) time complexity * May cause unnecessary reordering of elements, especially for already sorted arrays **Reduce:** Pros: * More efficient for large datasets (O(n)) since it only iterates through the array once * Less memory-intensive than sorting, as it doesn't create a new sorted array Cons: * Requires more complex implementation and understanding of the `reduce()` method * May not be as intuitive or widely supported as the `sort()` method **Other Considerations** The benchmark is running on a Mac OS X 10.15.7 desktop environment with Chrome 129, which might affect the results. **Library Used (if any)** None mentioned in the provided code snippets. However, if you're familiar with JavaScript libraries like Lodash or Ramda, they provide similar functionality for array manipulation and sorting/reducing. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark that would require specific expertise to understand. **Other Alternatives** If you were to create a similar benchmark, you could consider adding other approaches, such as: * Using a custom sorting algorithm (e.g., insertion sort) * Employing parallel processing to compare the performance of both methods * Incorporating modern JavaScript features like async/await or Promises to optimize the testing process Keep in mind that these alternatives would require significant modifications to the benchmark code and might not be relevant to this specific comparison.
Related benchmarks:
sort vs reduce
sort vs reduce
sort vs reduce for a few elements
sort vs reduce v2
sort vs reduce v3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?