Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Get param query-string vs URLSearchParams
(version: 0)
Read one parameter from the URL query
Comparing performance of:
query-string vs URLSearchParams
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type='module'> import qs from 'https://cdn.skypack.dev/query-string'; window.qs = qs </script>
Script Preparation code:
window.string = 'hola=mundo&soy=david' window.param = 'soy' window.qsParam = (query, key) => { const parsed = qs.parse(query); return parsed[key]; }; window.urlParam = (query, key) => { const parsed = new URLSearchParams(query); return parsed.get(key); };
Tests:
query-string
qsParam(string, param)
URLSearchParams
urlParam(string, param)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
query-string
URLSearchParams
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to parse query strings in JavaScript: `qsParam` (using the `query-string` library) and `urlParam` (built-in URLSearchParams API). **Options Compared** 1. **qsParam**: Uses a custom function `window.qsParam = ...` that takes a query string and a key as input, parses the query string using the `query-string` library (`qs.parse(query)`), and returns the value associated with the given key. 2. **urlParam**: Uses the built-in URLSearchParams API to parse the query string. **Pros and Cons** 1. **qsParam**: * Pros: Customizable, can be used in situations where the built-in URLSearchParams API is not available or desired. * Cons: Requires an external library (query-string), which may introduce additional dependencies and complexity. 2. **urlParam**: * Pros: Built-in API, widely supported across browsers, and relatively simple implementation. * Cons: Limited customization options compared to qsParam. **Library - query-string** The `query-string` library is used by the `qsParam` function to parse query strings. It's a popular and well-maintained library that provides a simple and flexible way to work with query strings in JavaScript. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** 1. **Browser Support**: The benchmark is run on a Chrome 116 browser, which supports the URLSearchParams API. 2. **Device Platform**: The benchmark is run on a desktop platform (Mac OS X), but it's not specified whether other platforms are also supported. 3. **Execution Frequency**: The benchmark measures executions per second, indicating that the goal is to evaluate performance under heavy execution loads. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to parse query strings in JavaScript include: 1. Using regular expressions to extract values from the query string. 2. Implementing a custom parser based on the URL protocol specification (RFC 3986). 3. Using other libraries or APIs, such as `qs` or `url-parser`. These alternative approaches may offer different trade-offs between performance, complexity, and customization options compared to the `qsParam` and `urlParam` implementations tested in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Window Perf
isEqual vs stringify
isEqual vs stringify returns false
Object.keys.filter vs Object.values.join
URLSearchParams impact
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?