Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
a123322
(version: 0)
a
Comparing performance of:
1 vs 2
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id='abc'> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> <p>123</p> </div>
Tests:
1
document.getElementById("abc").innerHTML = ''
2
const element = document.getElementById("abc") while(element.firstElementChild) element.firstElementChild.remove()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1
2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, the different approaches compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided `BenchmarkDefinition` json represents a JavaScript microbenchmark. It contains two test cases: 1. Test Case 1: ```json "Benchmark Definition": "document.getElementById(\"abc\").innerHTML = ''", ``` This test case measures the time it takes to clear the innerHTML of an element with id "abc". 2. Test Case 2: ```json "Benchmark Definition": "const element = document.getElementById(\"abc\")\r\nwhile(element.firstElementChild) element.firstElementChild.remove()", ``` This test case measures the time it takes to remove all child elements from an element with id "abc" using a while loop. **Options compared** The two test cases compare different approaches to clearing or removing content from an element: 1. **Test Case 1**: Uses `document.getElementById("abc").innerHTML = ''` to clear the innerHTML of the element. 2. **Test Case 2**: Uses `const element = document.getElementById("abc")\r\nwhile(element.firstElementChild) element.firstElementChild.remove()` to remove all child elements from the element. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Test Case 1:** * Pros: + Simple and concise + Fast execution (likely due to direct access to the innerHTML property) * Cons: + May not be suitable for elements with complex or nested content structures + Can lead to inefficient DOM manipulation if not used carefully 2. **Test Case 2:** * Pros: + Suitable for elements with complex content structures (e.g., multiple child elements) + Avoids potential pitfalls of using `innerHTML` with HTML strings * Cons: + More verbose and slower execution (due to the while loop) **Other Considerations** * The benchmark results indicate that Test Case 2 is slightly faster than Test Case 1. * Both test cases assume that the element with id "abc" exists in the DOM. In a real-world scenario, you might want to add error handling to ensure the element's existence before running these tests. **Context and Deployment** These microbenchmarks can be useful for: 1. Optimizing JavaScript code performance 2. Comparing different browser versions or engine implementations (e.g., Chrome 115) 3. Identifying potential bottlenecks in DOM manipulation code Keep in mind that microbenchmarks are typically used for small, isolated pieces of code and may not accurately represent the entire application's performance characteristics.
Related benchmarks:
test1_Has_Is
Class vs Id Jquery
ducking test5
Vanilla JS closest VS while loop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?