Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array: [] vs at()
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Array[] vs Array.at()
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var size = 0xffffff; var data = Array.from({length: size}, (_, index) => index);
Tests:
Array[]
let sum = 0 for (let i; i < size; i++) { sum += data[i] }
Array.at()
let sum = 0 for (let i; i < size; i++) { sum += data.at(i) }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array[]
Array.at()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
7 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 140 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=617535" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
Array[]
188899248.0 Ops/sec
Array.at()
194056336.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
array.prototype.at() vs array[array.length - 1]
array[0] vs array.at(0)
array[0] vs array.at(0) on 100000 elements
array[] vs array.at()
array[index] vs array.at(index)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?