Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
push vs length
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
push vs length
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
push
var a = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i += 1) { a.push(i); }
length
var a = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i += 1) { a[a.length] = i; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
push
length
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested in this specific benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a simple benchmark that compares two approaches: using `push` to add elements to an array versus using `length` to access the length property of an array. The goal is to determine which approach is faster. **Options Compared** There are only two options being compared: 1. **Push**: This involves adding 1000 elements to an array using the `push()` method. 2. **Length**: This involves accessing the length property of an array and then adding 1000 elements using array indexing (`a[a.length] = i`). **Pros and Cons** * **Push**: + Pros: Simple, intuitive, and widely supported in modern browsers. + Cons: May involve additional overhead due to the `push()` method's internal implementation. * **Length**: + Pros: May be faster due to the potential optimization of array length calculations. + Cons: Less common usage, which may lead to less accurate benchmarking results. **Other Considerations** The test case doesn't use any libraries or special JavaScript features beyond standard ECMAScript. However, it's essential to note that the specific implementation details of `push()` and other methods might vary across browsers, which could impact performance differences between these two approaches. **Library/Functionality Mentioned** There is no explicitly mentioned library, but it's worth noting that both `push` and `length` are part of the standard JavaScript API. However, some older browsers or implementations might use different methods for array length calculations, which could affect the benchmark results. **Special JS Feature/Syntax Mentioned** None of the test cases specifically utilize any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard ECMAScript. If you're interested in exploring more advanced topics, please let me know! **Alternatives** Other alternatives for creating microbenchmarks include: 1. Google Benchmark (a C++-based benchmarking framework) 2. MicroBenchmark (a Java-based benchmarking library) 3. Benchmark.js (a JavaScript-based benchmarking library) If you're looking to create a more comprehensive benchmarking setup, consider exploring these alternatives. That's a wrap! I hope this explanation helped you understand the benchmark and its comparisons.
Related benchmarks:
Array spread vs. push performance
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
spread vs push - simple
spread vs push large
Spread vs Push -
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?