Benchmark: Array find vs sum

Script Preparation code:

var array = [
            {
                "code": "FACEBOOK",
                "description": "Find us on Facebook",
                "value": "https://www.facebook.com/CDBPLC"
            },
            {
                "code": "LINKEDIN",
                "description": "Find us on Linkedin",
                "value": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/citizens-development-business-f"
            },
            {
                "code": "CALL_CENTER_TEL",
                "description": "Call center",
                "value": "0112380380"
            },
            {
                "code": "FAX",
                "description": "Fax",
                "value": "011222555"
            },
            {
                "code": "INSTAGRAM",
                "description": "Find us on Instagram",
                "value": "https://www.instagram.com/cdb.srilanka/"
            },
            {
                "code": "ADDRESS",
                "description": "Address",
                "value": "123, Orabipasha Mawatha, Colombo 10"
            },
            {
                "code": "TEL_NO",
                "description": "Our Hotlines",
                "value": "+94 117 388 000"
            },
            {
                "code": "EMAIL",
                "description": "Email us",
                "value": "customercare@cdb.lk"
            },
            {
                "code": "COMP_NAME",
                "description": "Company Name",
                "value": "Citizens Development Business Finance PLC"
            },
            {
                "code": "WEB",
                "description": "Find us",
                "value": "https://www.cdb.lk/"
            }
        ];

var orderOfDetailArr = [
    { code: 'COMP_NAME',icon:'icon-company' },
    { code: 'ADDRESS',icon:'icon-locator' },
    { code: 'TEL_NO',icon:'icon-phone-ring' },
    { code: 'CALL_CENTER_TEL',icon:'icon-phone-ring' },
    { code: 'FAX',icon:'icon-fax' },
    { code: 'EMAIL',icon:'icon-envlop' },
    { code: 'WEB',icon:'icon-website' },
  ]

var contactCode = orderOfDetailArr.map(({code})=>code);

Tests:

find
array.filter((o1) => orderOfDetailArr.some((o2) => o1.code === o2.code? o1.contact=o2.icon:'')) .sort( (a, b) => contactCode.indexOf(a.code) - contactCode.indexOf(b.code) );
some
array.filter((o1) => { const found = orderOfDetailArr.find(x => x.code === o1.code); if (found) { o1.contact = found.icon; return true; } return false; })

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
find
some

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll do my best to explain what's being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

This benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript methods: `filter()` with the `some()` method, and `filter()` without using `some()`. The tests are designed to find a specific code in an array and return the corresponding contact information.

**Test Case 1: "find"**

In this test case, we have an array of objects (`array`) and another array of codes (`orderOfDetailArr`). We want to find an object in `array` whose `code` matches one in `orderOfDetailArr`. The code uses `filter()` with a callback function that returns `true` if the condition is met.

**What's being tested:**

* The performance of using `filter()` with a single iteration over `orderOfDetailArr`.
* The use of the `some()` method to check if any element in `orderOfDetailArr` matches the `code` property of an object in `array`.

**Pros and Cons:**

* Using `filter()` with a single iteration is more efficient because it only iterates over `orderOfDetailArr` once.
* However, this approach assumes that the matching code will always be found in the array. If not, the method returns an empty array.
* The use of `some()` adds some overhead due to function call and parameter passing.

**Test Case 2: "some"**

In this test case, we have the same setup as before, but instead of using `filter()`, we use a more traditional approach with a for loop that iterates over each element in `orderOfDetailArr`. The code uses `find()` to locate an object in `array` whose `code` matches one in `orderOfDetailArr`.

**What's being tested:**

* The performance of using a traditional loop-based approach with `find()`.
* The use of the `some()` method is not applicable in this case.

**Pros and Cons:**

* This approach allows for more control over the iteration process, which can be beneficial in certain situations.
* However, it's generally less efficient than using `filter()` due to the overhead of function calls and parameter passing.
* The use of `find()` adds some overhead compared to a simple lookup.

**Library and Special JS Features**

In this benchmark, we're using:

* The `filter()` method, which is a built-in JavaScript method for filtering arrays.
* The `some()` method, which is also a built-in JavaScript method for testing if any element in an array satisfies a condition.
* The `find()` method, which is used in the traditional loop-based approach.

No special JS features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark.

**Alternatives**

If you were to rewrite this benchmark using different approaches, some alternatives could be:

* Using `map()` instead of `filter()` or `some()`.
* Using a more advanced data structure like a trie or a hash table for faster lookup.
* Implementing a custom algorithm that uses a different approach to find the matching code.

These alternatives would require significant changes to the benchmark setup and code, but could potentially lead to improved performance or efficiency.

Related benchmarks:

Array find vs sum (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: find vs some

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

find

some

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):