Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
asdfasdfasdfasdf asdf 4342 t
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
a vs a2
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
arr = ['asdf', 1, 1.1, true, null, undefined]; arr.length = 2000; arr[18] = 3.333;
Tests:
a
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { for (var c in arr) { void 0; } }
a2
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { for (var c in arr) { void 0; } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
a
a2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents the script or code snippet to be executed by MeasureThat.net. In this case, there are two benchmark definitions: 1. "asdfasdfasdfasdf asdf 4342 t" - This appears to be a descriptive title for the benchmark. 2. A JavaScript function: `for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {\r\n for (var c in arr) {\r\n\t void 0;\r\n }\r\n}` This is a simple loop that iterates over an array using a `for...in` loop. The inner loop also uses the `void 0` statement, which does nothing. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is executed before running the benchmark: ```javascript arr = ['asdf', 1, 1.1, true, null, undefined];\r\narr.length = 2000;\r\narr[18] = 3.333; ``` This code creates an array `arr` with 6 elements and sets its length to 2000, then assigns a value to the 19th element (index 18). **Html Preparation Code** There is no HTML preparation code provided. **Individual Test Cases** The test cases are JSON objects that represent individual runs of the benchmark: 1. `{ "Benchmark Definition": "...", "Test Name": "a" }` 2. `{ "Benchmark Definition": "...", "Test Name": "a2" }` These test cases use the same JavaScript function as the benchmark definition. **Comparing Options** MeasureThat.net compares different options by running the benchmark multiple times with varying settings and reporting the results. In this case, the two test cases differ only in their `Test Name` property, which is a unique identifier for each run. The pros and cons of using different `Test Name`s are: * Pros: + Allows MeasureThat.net to differentiate between runs with similar benchmark definitions. + Enables comparison of results across multiple test names. * Cons: + May lead to duplicate or missing data if the same test name is used for different runs. **Library and Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark definition uses a built-in JavaScript function, `void 0`, which does nothing. There are no external libraries or frameworks mentioned in this benchmark definition. **Other Considerations** MeasureThat.net aims to provide accurate and unbiased results by: * Using a variety of browsers, devices, and operating systems. * Running benchmarks multiple times to reduce variance. * Providing detailed statistics and metrics for each test case. **Alternatives** If you need to run JavaScript benchmarks or microbenchmarks, you can explore other alternatives such as: 1. Benchmark.js: A popular JavaScript benchmarking library. 2. jsperf: A simple web-based benchmarking tool. 3. js-benchmark: A lightweight JavaScript benchmarking library. 4. Google's Benchmark: A high-performance JavaScript benchmarking library. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different features, ease of use, and performance characteristics compared to MeasureThat.net.
Related benchmarks:
iterator speed1
at vs length
Speed of Arr.length and Slice
arr.at(index) vs arr[index]
1htrghdr
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?