Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
compare case insensitive strings
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
toLowerCase vs regex
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
a = "ABC"
Tests:
toLowerCase
a.toLowerCase() === "abc"
regex
a.match(/abc/gi)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
toLowerCase
regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for case-insensitive string matching: `toLowerCase()` method and regular expression with the `i` flag (case-insensitive mode). **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code simply assigns a variable `a` with the value `"ABC"` in uppercase letters. **Html Preparation Code** There's no HTML preparation code, so we'll focus on the JavaScript aspects only. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **toLowerCase**: The benchmark definition is `a.toLowerCase() === "abc"`. This tests whether the result of calling `toLowerCase()` on the string `"ABC"` equals `"abc"`. 2. **regex**: The benchmark definition is `a.match(/abc/gi) != null`. This tests whether the regular expression `/abc/gi` matches the string `"ABC"`. **Library and Purpose** In this benchmark, the `String.prototype.toLowerCase()` method is used, which is a part of the JavaScript standard library. Its purpose is to convert a string to lowercase. There's no explicit mention of any other libraries being used in this benchmark. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The regular expression `/abc/gi` uses the `g` flag (global flag) and the `i` flag (case-insensitive flag). The `g` flag makes the regex engine search for all matches, not just the first one. The `i` flag makes the match case-insensitive. **Pros and Cons** 1. **toLowerCase() method**: * Pros: Simple, straightforward, and widely supported. * Cons: May be slower than regular expressions due to the overhead of calling a method on an object. 2. **Regex (with g and i flags)**: * Pros: Can handle more complex cases, such as matching multiple substrings or using anchors for exact matches. Faster execution compared to `toLowerCase()` method. * Cons: More verbose, may be harder to read and maintain due to the complexity of regex syntax. **Other Alternatives** Other alternatives could include: 1. Using the `String.prototype.normalize()` method with the `FORMAL_Erasing` form (NFC) followed by a case-fold (CF) conversion, e.g., `a.normalize("NFC").replace(/[ABC]/gi, "abc")`. This approach is more complex and might not be as efficient. 2. Implementing a custom string comparison function using bitwise operations or hashing. However, these alternatives are less common and may not offer significant performance benefits over the existing approaches. **Benchmark Results** The benchmark results show that the `regex` test case executed approximately 4 times faster than the `toLowerCase()` method test case on this specific hardware configuration.
Related benchmarks:
toCamelCase
titlepipe test
Javascript: Case insensitive string comparison performance lowerLocale
Javascript: Case insensitive string comparison performance en-US accent
Test 1231241123
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?