Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Date.parse vs new Date.getTime
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
new Date().getTime vs Date.parse()
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
new Date().getTime
new Date('01/01/2001').getTime();
Date.parse()
Date.parse('01/01/2001');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
new Date().getTime
Date.parse()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into explaining the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net. **What is tested?** The benchmark tests two approaches to get the current time in milliseconds: using the `Date.parse()` method and the `new Date().getTime` method. **Options compared:** 1. **Date.parse()**: This method takes a string as input and returns the number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC. 2. **new Date().getTime**: This method returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix Epoch (January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC) in the local timezone. **Pros and Cons:** * **Date.parse()**: + Pros: Can be used with a specific date string, which might be useful for certain use cases. + Cons: May not work correctly with all date formats, can return incorrect results if the input string is malformed, and its performance is generally slower compared to `new Date().getTime`. * **new Date().getTime**: + Pros: More accurate and faster than `Date.parse()`, as it uses the system's clock directly. + Cons: Requires creating a new `Date` object, which might be overhead for some use cases. **Library usage:** In this benchmark, no specific library is used. The comparison is solely between two built-in JavaScript methods. **Special JS feature or syntax:** There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. **Other alternatives:** If you need to get the current time in milliseconds, other alternatives could be: * `performance.now()`: This method returns the number of milliseconds since the performance measurement started. * `Date.now()`: Similar to `new Date().getTime`, but might not work correctly in some environments (e.g., older browsers). * `Intl.DateTimeFormat().resolvedOptions().timeZoneOffset`: This method returns the offset from UTC in minutes, which can be used to get the current time. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different use cases and performance characteristics compared to the methods being tested in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Date.parse vs new Date3
Date.parse vs new Date().getTime()
new Date().getTime() vs Date.parse()
Date.parse vs getTime()
new Date().getTimer() vs Date.parse()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?