Benchmark: ES6 Class vs Object Literal 100k runs

Tests:

ES6 Class
class Point { constructor(x, y, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h){ this.x = x; this.y = y; this.a = a; this.b = b; this.c = c; this.d = d; this.e = e; this.f = f; this.g = g; this.h = h; } } for (var i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { var p1 = new Point(10, 10, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8); p1.x = p1.x - 1; }
Object Literal
for (var i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { var p1 = { x: 10, y: 10, a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5, f: 6, g: 7, h: 8 }; p1.x = p1.x - 1; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
ES6 Class
Object Literal

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 17_6_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) CriOS/135.0.7049.83 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile iOS 135 on iOS 17.6.1

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
ES6 Class	165.1 Ops/sec
Object Literal	24642.9 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, the options compared, pros and cons of each approach, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test case. In this case, there are two test cases:

1. "ES6 Class" - This test case uses the ES6 class syntax to define a `Point` class with 10 properties.
2. "Object Literal" - This test case uses an object literal to define an object with 10 properties.

**Options Compared**

The options compared in this benchmark are:

* Using ES6 classes (`ES6 Class`)
* Using object literals (`Object Literal`)

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

* **ES6 Classes**:
	+ Pros: Encapsulation, readability, and maintainability. Classes provide a way to organize code into logical units, making it easier to understand and modify.
	+ Cons: Overhead of creating an instance and accessing properties via the `this` keyword can be slower than object literals in some cases.
* **Object Literals**:
	+ Pros: Lightweight, fast access to properties. Object literals are often faster because they don't incur the overhead of creating an instance or accessing properties via the `this` keyword.
	+ Cons: Less readable and maintainable compared to classes.

**Library**

There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the Chrome browser is used as the test environment.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

None of the provided code snippets use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond ES6 classes.

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark runs 100,000 iterations for each test case.
* The `for` loop is used to create instances of the class or object literal and perform operations on them.
* The `x = x - 1` operation is performed on each instance after creation, which may affect performance.

**Alternatives**

If you wanted to modify this benchmark, you could consider adding other options, such as:

* Using constructor functions (e.g., `function Point(x, y, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h) { ... }`)
* Using destructuring assignment
* Adding more complex operations or data structures

However, the current benchmark is straightforward and effectively compares two popular ways to create objects in JavaScript.

Related benchmarks:

ES6 Class vs Object Literal 100k runs (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: ES6 Class vs Object Literal

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

ES6 Class

Object Literal

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):