Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Javascript uniqueBy key vs Javascript uniqueBy stringify
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Javascript uniqueBy key vs Javascript uniqueBy
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var users = [ { 'user': 'joey', 'age': 29 }, { 'user': 'joey', 'age': 32 }, { 'user': 'ross', 'age': 41 }, { 'user': 'ross', 'age': 25 }, { 'user': 'ross', 'age': 48 }, { 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 39 }, { 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 12 }, { 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 41 } ]
Tests:
Javascript uniqueBy key
const uniqueBy = (array, key) => array.filter((value, index, self) => self.findIndex((item) => item[key] === value[key]) === index); let uniqued = uniqueBy(users, 'user');
Javascript uniqueBy
function removeDuplicatesFromArray(arr) { return arr.filter((value, index, self) => index === self.findIndex(obj => JSON.stringify(obj) === JSON.stringify(value))); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Javascript uniqueBy key
Javascript uniqueBy
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks! **Benchmark Purpose:** The purpose of this benchmark is to compare two approaches for removing duplicates from an array in JavaScript: 1. The first approach, `Javascript uniqueBy key`, uses the `filter()` method with a custom callback function that checks for duplicate values based on a specific key. 2. The second approach, `Javascript uniqueBy`, uses a library function (`removeDuplicatesFromArray`) that implements a similar logic to remove duplicates from an array. **Options Compared:** 1. **Filter() Method**: This is the standard JavaScript method for creating a new array with only the elements that pass a test implemented by the user. 2. **Library Function (removeDuplicatesFromArray)**: A custom function provided in the benchmark code, which uses a similar logic to remove duplicates from an array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Filter() Method**: * Pros: Fast, efficient, and widely supported across browsers. * Cons: May not work well for large arrays or complex data structures, as it relies on the user-provided callback function. 2. **Library Function (removeDuplicatesFromArray)**: * Pros: Efficient, well-optimized, and easy to use for removing duplicates from an array. * Cons: Requires including additional code in your project (the library function), which may not be desirable for all projects. **Other Considerations:** 1. **Key-based filtering**: The `Javascript uniqueBy key` approach uses a key-based filtering method, which can lead to better performance when dealing with arrays containing hashable values. 2. **Stringification**: The `removeDuplicatesFromArray` library function uses stringification (converting objects to strings) as part of its duplicate detection logic. **Library Used:** The `removeDuplicatesFromArray` library is a custom implementation that provides an efficient way to remove duplicates from an array by comparing object values using stringification. This approach relies on the `JSON.stringify()` method, which converts JavaScript objects to strings. **Special JS Features or Syntax:** None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. Now, let's discuss alternatives: 1. **Lodash**: A popular utility library that provides a `uniqBy` function for removing duplicates from an array based on a custom key. 2. **Underscore.js**: Another utility library that provides a `uniqWith` function, similar to Lodash's `uniqBy`. 3. **Built-in Array Methods**: Other built-in methods like `every()` and `some()` can be used in combination with the `findIndex()` method to achieve duplicate removal. 4. **Custom Iterators**: For more complex data structures or custom filtering logic, using a custom iterator might provide a better solution. These alternatives offer varying degrees of convenience, performance, and flexibility compared to the two approaches tested in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
uniqWith vs uniqBy vs ES6 Set
Lodash "uniqWith" "unionBy" "uniqBy" 27062023
Native uniqueBy vs Lodash _.uniqBy
Lodash uniqBy vs Javascript uniqBy with key
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?