Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce 100k with gey generation
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Native
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var max2 = 100000; const toKey = (item) => item.date.toLocaleDateString() var data = []; for (var i = 0; i <= max2; i++) { data.push({ id: i, date: new Date(Date.now() + Math.floor(Math.random()*1000*60*60*24*30)) }); }
Tests:
Lodash
const toKey = (item) => item.date.toLocaleDateString(); _.groupBy(data, toKey)
Native
const toKey = (item) => item.date.toLocaleDateString(); data.reduce((acc, item) => { acc[toKey(item)] = item; return acc; }, {})
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing two approaches to group an array of objects by a specific property: `_.groupBy` from Lodash and the native `Array.prototype.reduce` method. **Options Compared** 1. **Lodash (`_.groupBy`)**: The Lodash library provides a convenient way to group arrays by a key function. 2. **Native (`Array.prototype.reduce`)**: The native approach uses the `reduce` method to accumulate objects in an object, where the keys are determined by the `toKey` function. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Lodash (`_.groupBy`)** * Pros: + More concise and readable code + Provides a convenient way to group arrays without writing custom code * Cons: + Adds an external dependency (Lodash library) + May have performance overhead due to the additional function call 2. **Native (`Array.prototype.reduce`)** Pros: * No external dependencies or potential performance overhead * Uses built-in JavaScript methods, which are generally optimized for performance Cons: * Requires writing custom code to group objects by a key * May be less readable than the Lodash approach **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object iteration, and more. The `_.groupBy` function takes an array and a key function as input and returns a new array with each element grouped by the key. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: None** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you don't want to use Lodash, you can also use other libraries like `underscore` (similar to Lodash) or implement a custom grouping function using `Array.prototype.reduce`. Alternatively, if you prefer not to use an external library or additional methods, you can also use a technique called "map-reduce" or "groupby-fn" to achieve the same result. This approach involves mapping each element of the array to its corresponding key and then reducing the resulting array using `Array.prototype.reduce`. Here's an example implementation: ```javascript const data = [...]; // your data array const groups = {}; data.forEach((item) => { const key = item.date.toLocaleDateString(); if (!groups[key]) { groups[key] = []; } groups[key].push(item); }); // Use the resulting groups object in your test ``` This implementation uses a simple object to store the grouped data, but you can modify it to suit your specific needs.
Related benchmarks:
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce on million items
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce 100k with array push
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce 100k better 2
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce vs Object.groupBy 100k
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce vs simple for loop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?