Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
window.getComputedStyle vs. inline style
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
getComputedStyle vs inline
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="foo" style="transform:scale(1);"></div>
Tests:
getComputedStyle
var i = 1000; while (i--) { chekele('foo'); } function chekele(id) { return window.getComputedStyle(document.getElementById(id)).transform != null; }
inline
var i = 1000; while (i--) { chekele('foo'); } function chekele(id) { return document.getElementById(id).style.transform != null; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
getComputedStyle
inline
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
10 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 137 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
getComputedStyle
936.5 Ops/sec
inline
7505.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined in two parts: 1. The HTML preparation code creates an empty `<div>` element with an ID of "foo" and styles it to have a `transform:scale(1)` CSS rule. 2. The script preparation code is not provided, but it likely sets up some variables and functions that will be used in the benchmark. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two test cases: 1. **getComputedStyle**: This test case uses the `window.getComputedStyle()` function to check if the `transform` CSS rule is present on the element with ID "foo". 2. **inline**: This test case uses the `document.getElementById(id).style.transform != null` syntax to check if the `transform` CSS rule is present on the element with ID "foo". **What's Being Tested** The benchmark is testing the performance difference between using `window.getComputedStyle()` and accessing the `style` property directly on an HTML element. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **window.getComputedStyle()**: This function returns a CSSStyleDeclaration object that represents the computed style of the specified element. 2. **inline**: This syntax accesses the `style` property directly on an HTML element, allowing direct access to the element's CSS rules. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **window.getComputedStyle()**: + Pros: - Provides a more robust way to retrieve an element's computed style, as it takes into account any applied CSS rules. - Can be useful for cross-browser compatibility issues. + Cons: - May be slower than accessing the `style` property directly on an HTML element. * **inline**: + Pros: - Faster than using `window.getComputedStyle()`, as it avoids the need to create and return a new object. + Cons: - May not work across all browsers, as some may not support accessing CSS rules on an HTML element. **Library Usage** Neither of these test cases uses any external libraries. The `getComputedStyle()` function is a built-in JavaScript method that returns the computed style of an element, while the inline syntax relies solely on the DOM API. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's necessary to access and manipulate HTML elements. No ES6+ features like async/await or template literals are used. **Other Alternatives** If you were to modify this benchmark, some alternative approaches could be explored: * Using a more robust CSS query method, such as `element.querySelector()` or `element.matchSelector()`, which may provide better performance and cross-browser compatibility. * Adding a third test case that uses a library like jQuery or another DOM manipulation library to access the element's style rules. * Introducing additional HTML elements with different styles to create more variability in the benchmark. Overall, this benchmark provides a straightforward comparison between two common ways to access an HTML element's CSS rules.
Related benchmarks:
toFixed -> Number vs Math.round
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() vs Math.floorfast 0
parseFloat(toFixed) vs Math.round()
toFixed vs Math.round() with numbers222
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?