Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Set vs Map
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Set vs Map
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Set
var set = new Set(["one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine", "ten"]);
Map
var set = new Map([["one", true], ["two", true], ["three", true], ["four", true], ["five", true], ["six", true], ["seven", true], ["eight", true], ["nine", true], ["ten", true]]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Set
Map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition:** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark, specifically comparing two data structures: Sets and Maps. A Set in JavaScript is an object that stores unique values (no duplicates), whereas a Map is an object that stores key-value pairs. **Options Compared:** In this benchmark, the following options are compared: 1. **Sets**: A Set of strings. 2. **Maps**: A Map where each key is a string and its value is always true. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** * **Sets**: * Pros: * Fast lookups ( O(1) ) since Sets use a hash table internally. * Efficient for adding or removing elements quickly. * Cons: * Cannot store values other than primitives (strings, numbers, etc.). * Does not support key-value pairs or object-like behavior. * **Maps**: * Pros: * Supports key-value pairs and can store more complex data types (including objects). * Allows for efficient lookups ( O(1) ), insertion, and deletion of elements. * Cons: * Slower than Sets due to the overhead of storing key-value pairs. **Library Usage:** Neither the Set nor Map implementations use any external libraries in this benchmark. However, they are native JavaScript data structures, which means they come built-in with the language. **Special JS Features or Syntax:** None are explicitly mentioned in the provided code snippets. **Other Considerations:** When choosing between Sets and Maps, consider the specific requirements of your application: * If you need to store unique values or perform fast lookups, Sets might be a better choice. * If you require storing key-value pairs or working with more complex data types, Maps are likely a better fit. **Alternative Approaches:** Other alternatives for achieving similar functionality include using other JavaScript data structures like: 1. **Arrays**: While not ideal for lookup-heavy operations, arrays can be used to store unique values. 2. **Objects**: Can be used to store key-value pairs, but might incur additional overhead due to the overhead of storing and accessing properties. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide the same performance as Sets or Maps, depending on the specific use case. By understanding the differences between Sets and Maps, developers can make informed decisions about which data structure best suits their needs.
Related benchmarks:
Create Map/Set vs reuse Map/Set
Array from() vs Map.keys()
Array from() vs Map.keys() vs Map.values() vs spread
Map.set vs Object assign
Map sets vs gets
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?