Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
number floor format
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Current vs Solution
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/bignumber.js/9.0.1/bignumber.min.js"></script> <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
Current
new BigNumber(0.1+0.2).toFormat(8, BigNumber.ROUND_FLOOR)
Solution
new Intl.NumberFormat("en-US", { maximumFractionDigits: 8, }).format(0.3);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Current
Solution
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of two ways to format numbers with decimal places: 1. **BigNumber library**: Uses the `toFormat` method to round the number to 8 decimal places using the floor function. 2. **Intl.NumberFormat API**: Uses the `format` method from the Intl.NumberFormat class to format the number as a string, rounding to 8 decimal places. **Options being compared** The two options are: * **BigNumber library with `toFormat` method**: This method is designed for large numbers and provides more control over rounding modes. * **Intl.NumberFormat API with `format` method**: This method is part of the modern JavaScript standard library and provides a simple way to format numbers as strings. **Pros and Cons** **BigNumber library with `toFormat` method:** Pros: * More control over rounding modes * Suitable for large numbers Cons: * Requires loading an additional library (BigNumber.js) * May have slower performance compared to native JavaScript methods **Intl.NumberFormat API with `format` method:** Pros: * Native JavaScript method, potentially faster performance * No additional libraries required Cons: * Less control over rounding modes * Limited support for large numbers **Other considerations** The benchmark uses two test cases: * **Current**: This test case measures the execution time of the `toFormat` method using the BigNumber library. * **Solution**: This test case measures the execution time of formatting a number as a string using the Intl.NumberFormat API. The benchmark also provides information about the device, browser, and operating system used to run the tests. **Other alternatives** Alternative methods for rounding numbers include: * `Math.round()`: Rounds to the nearest integer. * `Number.toFixed()`: Rounds to a specified number of decimal places (not exactly the same as using the floor function). * Other libraries or frameworks that provide similar functionality, such as Moment.js for date and time formatting. In general, when choosing between these methods, consider factors like performance, control over rounding modes, and compatibility with different browsers and devices.
Related benchmarks:
validate bignumber.js shiftedBy
validate bignumber.js big.js shiftedBy
lose precision solution
bignumber.js vs. big.js vs. decimal.js in 2024-05-03
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?