Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
AND for VR4300
(version: 0)
Implementation of AND for n64.
Comparing performance of:
Using BigIntArray vs Using Int32Array / Uint32Array
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
let buf = new ArrayBuffer(24); u64 = new BigUint64Array(buf); s64 = new BigInt64Array(buf); let bufHi = new ArrayBuffer(12); let bufLo = new ArrayBuffer(12); u32Lo = new Uint32Array(bufLo); u32Hi = new Uint32Array(bufHi); s32Lo = new Int32Array(bufLo); s32Hi = new Int32Array(bufHi);
Tests:
Using BigIntArray
u64[0] = u64[1] & u64[2];
Using Int32Array / Uint32Array
u32Lo[0] = u32Lo[1] & u32Lo[1]; u32Hi[0] = u32Hi[1] & u32Hi[2];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using BigIntArray
Using Int32Array / Uint32Array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of different JavaScript approaches to implement bitwise AND operations on unsigned 64-bit integers (u64) and unsigned 32-bit integers (u32). The tests are designed to compare the efficiency of using BigIntArray versus Int32Array/Uint32Array for these operations. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Using BigIntArray**: This test case uses the `BigUint64Array` and `BigInt64Array` constructors to create arrays that can handle 64-bit integers. The benchmark definition is a simple bitwise AND operation between three consecutive elements in the array (`u64[0] = u64[1] & u64[2];`). The script preparation code sets up the necessary array buffers and constructors. 2. **Using Int32Array/Uint32Array**: This test case uses the `Int32Array` and `Uint32Array` constructors to create arrays that can handle 32-bit integers. The benchmark definition is a simple bitwise AND operation between two consecutive elements in different parts of the array (`u32Lo[0] = u32Lo[1] & u32Lo[1];` and `u32Hi[0] = u32Hi[1] & u32Hi[2];`). The script preparation code sets up the necessary array buffers, constructors, and type conversions between integers. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **BigIntArray**: Pros: + Can handle larger integers (up to 2^68 - 1) without losing precision. + May be more efficient for operations involving very large numbers. Cons: + Requires a modern JavaScript engine that supports BigInt. + May have performance overhead due to the use of arbitrary-precision arithmetic. * **Int32Array/Uint32Array**: Pros: + Wide support across different browsers and engines, including older versions. + Typically faster execution speeds for smaller integers. Cons: + Limited to 32-bit integer range (up to 2^31 - 1). + May lose precision when dealing with very large numbers. **Library Considerations** The benchmark uses the following libraries: * `BigUint64Array`: A typed array that can handle arbitrary-precision unsigned 64-bit integers. * `BigInt64Array`: A typed array that can handle arbitrary-precision signed 64-bit integers (not used in this benchmark). These libraries are part of the JavaScript standard library and provide support for working with large integers. **Special JS Features** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the provided code snippet. However, it's worth noting that some older browsers may not support BigInt or arbitrary-precision arithmetic. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to implement bitwise AND operations could include: * Using a library like `numjs` or `mathjs`, which provide optimized implementations for numerical computations. * Implementing the operation manually using bit manipulation instructions (e.g., `AND` Assembly instruction). * Using a different data structure, such as a buffer or a vector, to represent the numbers. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be suitable for all use cases and may require significant modifications to the benchmark code.
Related benchmarks:
Uint(8/16/32)Array.set performance compare
JS number to UInt8Array 64-bit little endian
Uint(8/16/32)Array and BigInt64Array comparison performance
SLT for VR4300
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?