Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Vue Reactive vs Ref both objects
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Reactive vs Ref
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://unpkg.com/vue@3"></script>
Tests:
Reactive
const {reactive, ref, computed} = Vue; const v = reactive({ foo: "bar" }); const bar = v.foo; const frog = computed(()=>{ return v.foo + "!"; }); v.foo = "foo"
Ref
const {reactive, ref, computed} = Vue; const foo = ref({foo: "bar"}); const bar = foo.value.foo; const frog = computed(()=>{ return foo.value.bar + "!"; }); foo.value.bar = "foo"
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Reactive
Ref
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares two approaches to create reactive objects in Vue.js: 1. `reactive`: creates an object that is reactive, meaning its properties will be updated automatically when one of its children changes. 2. `ref`: creates a reference to an object, which can also be used to create reactive behavior. **Options being compared** The benchmark is comparing the performance of using `reactive` and `ref` objects in different scenarios. **Pros and Cons:** * **Reactive (using `$reactive`)**: + Pros: - More straightforward to use, as it's a direct function call. - Provides automatic reactivity for nested properties. + Cons: - Can be slower due to the overhead of creating a reactive proxy object. * **Ref (using `$ref`)**: + Pros: - Generally faster, as it only creates a reference to an existing object. - Allows for more control over the creation and management of reactive objects. + Cons: - Requires more code and setup, as you need to create and manage a `ref` object. **Library usage** In both test cases, the `Vue` library is used. Specifically: * `reactive` and `computed` are part of Vue's reactivity system, which allows for automatic updates of nested properties. * `$ref` is a special function in Vue that creates a reference to an existing object. **Special JavaScript features** This benchmark doesn't mention any specific JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's required by the Vue library. However, it does use some Vue-specific APIs and concepts, such as reactivity and computed properties. **Other alternatives** If you were to create similar benchmarks for other JavaScript frameworks or libraries, you might consider testing: * React: similar approaches could be tested using `useState` and `useCallback`. * Angular: would likely require a different approach, as it has its own specific reactive concepts (e.g., `$observable`). * Other libraries: Depending on the library being benchmarked, you might need to use different APIs or syntax. Keep in mind that each framework or library has its unique characteristics and constraints. The best approach will depend on the specific use case and requirements of your project.
Related benchmarks:
React Const vs Function - fixed
React Const vs Function - fixed2
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()) vs structuredClone
React const vs function 2024
React const vs function 2024 (swapped order)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?