Benchmark: Render Test: Handlebars vs Hogan vs Mustache

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.js/4.7.7/handlebars.min.js" integrity="sha512-RNLkV3d+aLtfcpEyFG8jRbnWHxUqVZozacROI4J2F1sTaDqo1dPQYs01OMi1t1w9Y2FdbSCDSQ2ZVdAC8bzgAg==" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mustache.js/4.0.1/mustache.min.js" integrity="sha512-6AXIWogbKpsHvoZJrJtHpIYES4wP8czSj0zk7ZfwOYS8GWYFNSykwdfapt7yQc4ikZytemBu+QyVObzBHJMwYg==" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/hogan.js/3.0.2/hogan.min.js" integrity="sha512-F6j8lc1UBrmZHqUGreg4gNVVMCehTbf/LU0s/nnsQJYVeFSdpci+fcL48gsTd1Fbf08sD/kL+is2QiEssvJ70g==" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var template = "<strong>This is a slightly more complicated {{thing}}.</strong>.\n{{! Just ignore this business. }}\nCheck this out:\n{{#hasThings}}\n<ul>\n{{#things}}\n<li class={{className}}>{{word}}</li>\n{{/things}}</ul>.\n{{/hasThings}}\n{{^hasThings}}\n\n<small>Nothing to check out...</small>\n{{/hasThings}}";
var data = {
  thing: 'thing',
  hasThings: true,
  things: [
    { className: 'class1', word: 'word1' },
    { className: 'class2', word: 'word2' },
    { className: 'class3', word: 'word3' },
  ]
};

var handlebarsRenderer = Handlebars.compile(template);
var hoganRenderer = Hogan.compile(template);
Mustache.parse(template);

Tests:

Handlebars
handlebarsRenderer(data)
Hogan
hoganRenderer.render(data)
Mustache
Mustache.render(template, data)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Handlebars
Hogan
Mustache

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons of each approach, library usage, special JS features or syntax, and alternatives.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark measures the rendering performance of three templating engines: Handlebars, Hogan, and Mustache. The test creates a complex template with nested loops, conditionals, and variables, and then passes sample data to each engine to render the template.

**Options compared:**

1. **Handlebars**: Uses the Handlebars.js library to compile and render the template.
2. **Hogan**: Uses the Hogan.js library to compile and render the template.
3. **Mustache**: Uses the Mustache.js library to parse and render the template.

**Pros and cons of each approach:**

1. **Handlebars**:
	* Pros: Well-established library with a large community, fast rendering performance, and easy-to-use API.
	* Cons: Can be less flexible than Hogan or Mustache due to its more rigid syntax.
2. **Hogan**:
	* Pros: Faster rendering performance compared to Handlebars, more flexible syntax, and supports both imperative and declarative templating.
	* Cons: Smaller community compared to Handlebars, and some users may find the syntax less intuitive.
3. **Mustache**:
	* Pros: Simple and lightweight library, fast rendering performance, and easy-to-use API.
	* Cons: Less flexible than Hogan or Handlebars due to its simpler syntax.

**Library usage:**

1. **Handlebars**: Used for template compilation and rendering.
2. **Hogan**: Used for template compilation and rendering.
3. **Mustache**: Used for template parsing and rendering.

**Special JS features or syntax:**

1. **Handlebars**: Uses the `{{}}` syntax for variables and expressions, as well as `{#}` and `{^}` for loops and conditionals.
2. **Hogan**: Supports both imperative (`hogan.compile()`) and declarative (`hogan.render()`) templating approaches.
3. **Mustache**: Uses the `{{}}` syntax for variables and expressions, as well as `{#}` for loops.

**Alternatives:**

1. **Pug**: A templating engine that uses a more concise syntax and is known for its performance.
2. **EJS (Embedded JavaScript)**: A templating engine that allows developers to embed JavaScript code directly into templates.
3. **Liquid**: A templating engine used in Ruby on Rails, which provides a flexible and customizable syntax.

In summary, the benchmark tests the rendering performance of three popular templating engines, Handlebars, Hogan, and Mustache, with a focus on their syntax, rendering speed, and flexibility. The results can help developers choose the best template engine for their specific use case.

Related benchmarks:

Render Test: Handlebars vs Hogan vs Mustache (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Handlebars vs Hogan vs Mustache

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Handlebars

Hogan

Mustache

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):