Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
min func vs inline min
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
min func vs inline min
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.min = (val, min) => val < min ? min : val;
Tests:
min func
const v = Math.round() * 1000; const m = Math.round() * 1000; const result = min(v, m);
inline min
const v = Math.round() * 1000; const m = Math.round() * 1000; const result = v < m ? m : v;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
min func
inline min
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to implement the minimum function in JavaScript: using an explicit `min` function (let's call it "min func") and implementing it inline directly in the code (let's call it "inline min"). **Options Compared** * **Min Func**: The first approach uses a separate, named function `window.min` that takes two arguments, `val` and `min`, and returns the minimum value between them. * **Inline Min**: The second approach implements the minimum function directly in the code using an inline if-else statement. **Pros and Cons** * **Min Func** + Pros: - Easier to read and understand for complex logic - Reusable and can be used in multiple places - Separation of concerns: a separate function for minimum calculation + Cons: - Additional overhead due to function call - Might require additional memory allocation * **Inline Min** + Pros: - Reduced overhead due to no function call - More concise code - Fewer variables and control structures + Cons: - Less readable for complex logic - Not reusable (unless implemented as a separate function) - Might make the code harder to maintain **Library Used** None of the benchmarked code uses any external libraries. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. Both implementations use standard JavaScript syntax and do not utilize any advanced features like async/await, generators, or decorators. **Other Alternatives** For this specific problem, other alternatives could be: * Using the built-in `Math.min()` function (a more concise option) * Implementing a custom binary search algorithm to find the minimum value However, these alternatives might not directly compare to the min func and inline min approaches in terms of performance or readability. I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested in the benchmark!
Related benchmarks:
math max vs homemade
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary vs bitwise - 4 numbers
World's Fasted Min Max
Math min simple vs ternary greater than
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?