Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Moment.js string vs Date in constructor
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
String date vs Date() date
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>
Tests:
String date
const date = moment('22-01-1996')
Date() date
const date = moment(new Date('22-01-1996'))
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
String date
Date() date
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 133 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=590919" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Date() date
3.7M/s
String date
1.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Date() date
3,749,256 Ops/sec
String date
1,838,292 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two ways to create a Date object using Moment.js, a popular JavaScript library for working with dates. **Moment.js Library** Moment.js is a lightweight library that provides a simple and intuitive way to work with dates in JavaScript. It allows you to easily parse dates from strings, perform arithmetic operations on dates, and more. The library is widely used and has a large community of users and developers who contribute to it. In this benchmark, Moment.js is used to create Date objects using two different methods: 1. **String date**: This method uses the `moment()` function to parse a string representing a date (e.g., "22-01-1996"). The resulting Date object represents the specified date. 2. **Date() date**: This method creates a new Date object by calling the built-in JavaScript `Date` constructor and passing a string representing a date as an argument (e.g., "22-01-1996"). **Tested Options** The benchmark compares two options: 1. **String date**: Using Moment.js to parse a string representing a date. 2. **Date() date**: Creating a new Date object using the built-in JavaScript `Date` constructor and passing a string representing a date as an argument. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **String date (Moment.js)**: + Pros: Can handle more complex date formats, including international formats. + Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of parsing the string. * **Date() date**: + Pros: Typically faster than parsing a string, as it avoids the overhead of parsing. + Cons: Limited by the input string format, which may not support all possible date formats. **Other Considerations** When working with dates in JavaScript, it's essential to consider factors like timezone awareness, daylight saving time (DST) rules, and cultural formatting. Moment.js provides a convenient way to handle these complexities, but it also introduces additional overhead due to its parsing mechanisms. **Alternative Approaches** If you don't want to use a library like Moment.js, you can create Date objects using the built-in JavaScript `Date` constructor or by manually parsing the date string using regular expressions. However, these approaches may not be as convenient or efficient as using a library like Moment.js. In summary, this benchmark tests two ways to create Date objects using Moment.js and compares their performance. The choice of approach depends on your specific use case, with string date (Moment.js) offering more flexibility but potentially slower performance, and Date() date being faster but limited by the input string format.
Related benchmarks
MomentJS vs Native Date
moment vs native
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?