Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Rest parameters vs array parameter 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Rest vs Array
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Rest
const f = (a, ...b) => a.concat(b.map(String)) const r = f([0], ...[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]);
Array
const f = (a, b) => a.concat(b.map(String)) const r = f([0], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Rest
Array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases for you. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript: 1. Using rest parameters (`...b`) with the spread operator (`...`). 2. Using an array parameter (`b`). **Options Compared:** In this benchmark, the following options are compared: * Rest parameters (`...b`) * Array parameter (`b`) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Rest Parameters (`...b`)**: * Pros: + Can be more concise and readable for simple cases. + Allows for a flexible number of arguments to be passed. * Cons: + May lead to confusion or unexpected behavior if not used carefully. + Not all browsers support rest parameters (older versions of Safari, for example). 2. **Array Parameter (`b`)**: * Pros: + Wide browser compatibility. + Can be more explicit and easier to understand. * Cons: + Less concise than rest parameters in some cases. **Library and Its Purpose:** In the test case "Rest", the `String` function is used, which is a built-in JavaScript library. The purpose of using `String` here is likely to ensure that the concatenation operation happens at the string level (using the `map` method), rather than at the array level. **Special JS Feature or Syntax:** In this benchmark, no special JavaScript features or syntax are used. However, rest parameters were introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and have been supported by most modern browsers since then. **Other Alternatives:** If you wanted to test different approaches for concatenating arrays, you could consider adding more options to the benchmark definition, such as: * Using `Array.prototype.concat()` with two separate arrays. * Using a custom function or library for array concatenation. These alternatives might provide interesting insights into performance and readability aspects of different techniques.
Related benchmarks:
push vs unshift
Array constructor vs literal performance, 12345
Array.from() vs []
Array() vs new Array() fill
Array.slice() vs. Spread operator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?