Benchmark: lodash.each vs Object.forEach

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.16.0/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var values = [{a: 30310}, {b: 100303}, {c: 3040494}]

Tests:

lodash forEach
_.forEach(values, function(v,i) {})
Array foreach
values.forEach(function(v,i) {})

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash forEach
Array foreach

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net!

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case that compares two approaches: using the `_.forEach` function from Lodash (a popular utility library) and the built-in `Array.forEach` method.

**Options being compared:**

1. **_.forEach**: This is the first option, which uses the `_.forEach` function from Lodash to iterate over an array.
2. **Array.forEach**: The second option uses the built-in `Array.forEach` method, which is also used in the benchmark test case with a custom callback function.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. **_.forEach (Lodash)**:
	* Pros:
		+ Often faster than `Array.forEach` due to optimizations by Lodash.
		+ Provides additional utility functions that can be useful in certain scenarios.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires including the Lodash library, which may increase bundle size and complexity.
2. **Array.forEach**:
	* Pros:
		+ No external dependencies required.
		+ Native implementation, so no potential optimizations are lost.
	* Cons:
		+ May be slower than `_.forEach` due to optimizations by Lodash.

In general, if you're working with large datasets and performance is crucial, using the built-in `Array.forEach` method might be a better choice. However, if you frequently work with arrays in your codebase and want to leverage additional utility functions from Lodash, `.forEach` might be a more suitable option.

**Library used:**

In this benchmark test case, the library being used is Lodash (version 4.16.0). Lodash is a popular utility library that provides various helper functions for tasks like array manipulation, object iteration, and more. The `_.forEach` function is just one of many functions available in Lodash.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested or used in this benchmark test case.

**Benchmark preparation code and HTML:**

The script preparation code sets up an array of objects (`values`) that will be used for the benchmark. The HTML Preparation Code includes a link to the Lodash CDN, which loads the required library.

**Alternative approaches:**

If you want to compare other approaches or libraries, MeasureThat.net provides a variety of benchmark test cases and tools. Some examples include:

* Using native JavaScript `Array.prototype.forEach` vs. Lodash's `_forEach`
* Comparing different array methods (e.g., `map`, `filter`, `reduce`) with their optimized implementations
* Testing various algorithms for specific tasks (e.g., sorting, searching)
* Evaluating the performance of different frameworks or libraries (e.g., React, Angular)

Feel free to explore MeasureThat.net's extensive collection of benchmark test cases and find more interesting comparisons!

Related benchmarks:

lodash.each vs Object.forEach (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash forEach vs Array foreach

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash forEach

Array foreach

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):