Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Date Comparison 20230620-2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Moment Symbol vs Moment isAfter vs Date Symbol vs Date Constructor
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/moment/moment@2.24.0/moment.js"></script>
Tests:
Moment Symbol
moment("2023-06-30T04:00:00") > moment()
Moment isAfter
moment("2023-06-30T04:00:00").isAfter(moment())
Date Symbol
Date.parse("2023-06-30T04:00:00") > Date.now()
Date Constructor
new Date("2023-06-30T04:00:00") > new Date()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Moment Symbol
Moment isAfter
Date Symbol
Date Constructor
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Overview** The test bench measures the performance of different approaches for date comparison in JavaScript. It uses three libraries: `moment.js`, `Date.parse()`, and the built-in `Date` constructor. **Options Compared** Here are the options being compared: 1. **Moment.js**: A popular library for working with dates and times in JavaScript. 2. **Date.parse()**: A built-in function that parses a string into a number representing the time in milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC. 3. **Built-in Date Constructor**: Creating a new `Date` object using the constructor. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of each approach: * **Moment.js**: + Pros: - Highly performant and optimized for date comparisons - Provides a convenient API for working with dates and times + Cons: - Adds an external dependency (library) - May have licensing restrictions or limitations for certain use cases * **Date.parse()**: + Pros: - Built-in function, no external dependencies required - Fast and efficient for simple date comparisons + Cons: - Can be brittle and sensitive to formatting issues - Not designed for complex date calculations or manipulations * **Built-in Date Constructor**: + Pros: - No external dependencies required - Suitable for simple date comparisons and manipulations + Cons: - May not be as performant as Moment.js for complex date operations - Requires manual handling of date formatting and parsing **Library: moment.js** Moment.js is a popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. It provides a convenient API for formatting, parsing, and manipulating dates, and is widely used in web development. In the provided benchmark, Moment.js is used to compare two dates using the `moment()` function, which returns an object representing the date. The `isAfter()` method is then used to determine if one date is after another. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: None** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in alternative libraries for working with dates and times, here are a few options: * **Date-fns**: A modern JavaScript library for working with dates and times that provides a simpler API than Moment.js. * **Luxon**: A powerful and flexible date and time library that provides a wide range of features and APIs. Overall, the benchmark provides a useful comparison of different approaches for date comparison in JavaScript, highlighting the pros and cons of using Moment.js, `Date.parse()`, and the built-in Date Constructor.
Related benchmarks:
moment vs datefns format f
Moment Date vs string
date-fns vs moment
date-fns vs moment addDays
date-fns vs moment addDays2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?