Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Time libraries simple format
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
luxon vs moment vs dayjs vs datefns vs joda
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/js-joda/1.11.0/js-joda.min.js" integrity="sha512-piLlO+P2f15QHjUv0DEXBd4HvkL03Orhi30Ur5n1E4Gk2LE4BxiBAP/AD+dxhxpW66DiMY2wZqQWHAuS53RFDg==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script> <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.30.1/date_fns.min.js" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/dayjs/1.11.8/dayjs.min.js" integrity="sha512-af90l7+r/ujCury3kqomcoZ4aNuC4JP0xUUU682bqlRCLLvGJrc9L82zONFccLWmxcMXSqO9d6C7Rr39EkbT3Q==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/luxon/3.3.0/luxon.min.js" integrity="sha512-KKbQg5o92MwtJKR9sfm/HkREzfyzNMiKPIQ7i7SZOxwEdiNCm4Svayn2DBq7MKEdrqPJUOSIpy1v6PpFlCQ0YA==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var m = moment() var l = luxon.DateTime.now() var d = new Date() var day = dayjs() var j = JSJoda.LocalDateTime.now()
Tests:
luxon
luxon.DateTime.now().toFormat('HH:mm')
moment
moment().format('HH:mm')
dayjs
dayjs().format('HH:mm')
datefns
dateFns.format(new Date(), 'HH:mm')
joda
JSJoda.LocalDateTime.now().format(JSJoda.DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern('HH:mm'))
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
luxon
moment
dayjs
datefns
joda
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark definition and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is comparing the performance of different libraries for formatting dates in a specific format: `HH:mm`. The libraries involved are: 1. Luxon (luxon) 2. Moment.js (moment) 3. Day.js (dayjs) 4. Date-fns (datefns) 5. JSJoda (joda) **What's being tested?** Each test case measures the execution time of formatting a date using one specific library. The format is `HH:mm`, which expects two digits for hours and minutes. **Options compared:** * Different libraries have their own ways of formatting dates. * Each library has its own advantages and disadvantages. Pros and Cons: 1. **Luxon (luxon)** * Pros: + Fast and efficient + Easy to use with modern JavaScript features (e.g., destructuring, template literals) * Cons: + Less popular than other libraries, which can lead to fewer resources and less community support. 2. **Moment.js (moment)** * Pros: + Wide adoption and large community + Well-established and widely supported * Cons: + Can be slower due to its size and overhead + Less modern JavaScript features compatibility 3. **Day.js (dayjs)** * Pros: + Fast and efficient, similar to Luxon + Easy to use with a simple API * Cons: + Smaller community compared to Moment.js 4. **Date-fns (datefns)** * Pros: + Small size and fast execution + Easy to use with a simple API 5. **JSJoda (joda)** * Pros: + Fast and efficient, similar to Luxon + Specific focus on date and time functionality **Special JS feature or syntax:** None mentioned in this benchmark. **Library usage and purpose:** 1. **Luxon**: A modern JavaScript library for working with dates and times. 2. **Moment.js**: A widely used library for parsing and formatting dates, primarily designed for use with the Moment.js API (not shown in this benchmark). 3. **Day.js**: A fast and efficient date and time library built on top of Luxon. 4. **Date-fns**: A small and lightweight library providing basic date and time functionality. 5. **JSJoda**: A Java-based library for working with dates and times, adapted for use in JavaScript. **Other alternatives:** * Other libraries like `dateutil`, `moment-timezone` ( Moment.js), or `datepicker` can also be used for similar purposes. * For more advanced date and time functionality, consider using full-fledged libraries like `luxon-timezone` or `joda` with additional features. **Benchmark result explanation:** The benchmark results show the execution time of each library in seconds per second. The results indicate that: * Luxon is the fastest followed by Day.js * Moment.js and datefns are slower due to their larger size and overhead. * JSJoda has similar performance to Luxon. Keep in mind that these results might vary depending on your specific use case, JavaScript environment, and hardware. It's always a good idea to test different libraries for your specific requirements to ensure the best performance.
Related benchmarks:
Moment vs Luxon addDay
Moment vs Luxon add day / add sec
luxon vs datefns vs moment vs day.js
luxon vs datefns vs moment vs dayjs (calculations) new
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?