Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
splice vs filter array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
slice vs filter
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var test=Array.from({length: 100},()=>Math.random())
Tests:
slice
test.splice(50,1)
filter
test.filter((e,i)=>i!=50)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
slice
filter
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 109 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
slice
19.7M/s
filter
1.1M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
slice
19,663,742 Ops/sec
filter
1,094,392 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **What is tested:** The benchmark tests the performance difference between two JavaScript methods for removing elements from an array: `splice` and `filter`. The arrays are generated using `Array.from()` and filled with random numbers, ensuring that the results are not influenced by specific values or patterns. **Options compared:** Two options are compared: 1. **`splice(50, 1)`**: This method removes the element at index 50 from the array. 2. **`filter((e, i) => i != 50)`**: This method creates a new array containing only the elements that do not match the condition `i != 50`, effectively removing the element at index 50. **Pros and cons of each approach:** 1. **`splice`**: * Pros: Efficient in terms of memory usage, as it modifies the original array. * Cons: Modifies the original array, which might be undesirable for certain use cases (e.g., when preserving the original array's state). 2. **`filter`**: * Pros: Preserves the original array, making it suitable for scenarios where the original data needs to remain intact. * Cons: Creates a new array, potentially leading to increased memory usage. **Library and purpose:** In this benchmark, `Array.from()` is used to generate an array of random numbers. This library is a modern JavaScript method that creates a new array populated with elements from an iterable (in this case, a function). **Special JS feature or syntax:** The `filter` method uses the arrow function syntax (`(e, i) => i != 50`). Arrow functions are a concise way to define small, single-expression functions in JavaScript. They were introduced in ECMAScript 2015 and have since become a popular choice for simple function definitions. **Other alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative approaches to remove elements from an array: * **`map()`**: While not suitable for removing elements, `map()` can be used with the `every()` method to filter out unwanted values. * **`reduce()`**: This method can also be used to filter elements, but it's typically more complex and less efficient than `filter`. * **`forEach()`**: Not recommended for large datasets or performance-critical scenarios, as it's generally slower and less memory-efficient than `filter`. For removing elements from an array specifically: * **`splice()`**: As mentioned earlier, this method is efficient in terms of memory usage but modifies the original array. * **`slice()`**: Similar to `splice()`, but creates a shallow copy of the array slice. * **`Array.prototype.remove()`**: A modern alternative to `splice()`, which creates a new array with the removed element. In summary, the benchmark compares the performance of two methods for removing elements from an array: `splice` and `filter`. The choice between these approaches depends on your specific use case requirements, such as preserving the original array's state or minimizing memory usage.
Related benchmarks
slice with indexof vs filter
Lodash filter vs splice removing item from array
Shorten array -- slice vs filter
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?