Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash cloneDeep vs merge vs ES6 object spread vs ES6 Object.assign
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash clone deep vs Object spread vs Assign
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.19/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var o = { a: { b: 1, c: 2, d: 3, j: { k: [1, 2, 3], l: [4, 5, 6] }, }, e: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], f: 1, g: { h: 1, } }
Tests:
lodash clone deep
const a = _.cloneDeep(o)
Object spread
const a = { ...o }
Assign
const a = Object.assign({}, o)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash clone deep
Object spread
Assign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The benchmark compares the performance of three approaches to create a deep copy of an object: Lodash's `cloneDeep`, Object spread operator (`{ ...o }`), and `Object.assign()`. **Library Used** In this benchmark, the library used is Lodash, specifically its `cloneDeep` function. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various helper functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object manipulation, and more. The purpose of using Lodash's `cloneDeep` function in this benchmark is to create a deep copy of an object, which involves recursively creating new objects for all nested properties. **Special JS Features or Syntax** In this benchmark, the following special JavaScript features or syntax are used: * **Object spread operator**: This is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018. It allows you to create a new object by spreading an existing object's properties into it using the `{ ... }` syntax. * **Object.assign()**: This is another built-in JavaScript method that creates a new object by copying all enumerable own properties from one or more source objects into a target object. **Approaches Compared** The three approaches compared in this benchmark are: 1. **Lodash cloneDeep**: Uses Lodash's `cloneDeep` function to create a deep copy of the input object. 2. **Object spread operator ( {...} )**: Creates a new object by spreading the properties of the original object using the `{ ... }` syntax. 3. **Object.assign()**: Creates a new object by copying all enumerable own properties from the original object into it. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Lodash cloneDeep**: + Pros: Provides a simple way to create a deep copy of an object, handles complex nested objects recursively. + Cons: Requires Lodash library, can be slower than other approaches for very large inputs. * **Object spread operator ( {...} )**: + Pros: Fast and lightweight, does not require any additional libraries. + Cons: Only creates a shallow copy of the object, may not handle complex nested objects correctly. * **Object.assign()**: + Pros: Simple to use, handles simple cases well. + Cons: Can be slower than other approaches for very large inputs, only creates a shallow copy of the object. **Other Considerations** When choosing an approach for creating a deep copy of an object in JavaScript, consider factors such as: * Performance: Object spread operator and `Object.assign()` are generally faster than Lodash's `cloneDeep`. * Complexity: If you need to handle complex nested objects with multiple levels of recursion, Lodash's `cloneDeep` may be the best choice. * Library dependencies: If you want to avoid using an additional library like Lodash, consider using the object spread operator or `Object.assign()`. **Alternative Approaches** If you're looking for alternative approaches to create a deep copy of an object in JavaScript, consider: * **JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))**: This approach creates a new object by recursively copying all properties from the original object. * **Array.prototype.slice.call(obj) + Array.prototype.reduce()**: This approach creates a new array and then uses `reduce()` to merge it with the original object. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and complexity compared to the approaches used in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Object cloning with Lodash clone vs cloneDeep vs merge vs ES6 object spread vs ES6 Object.assign
Object cloning with Lodash clone vs cloneDeep vs merge vs ES6 object spread vs ES6 Object.assign vs JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())
Object cloning with Lodash clone vs cloneDeep vs merge vs ES6 object spread vs ES6 Object.assign vs Clone
Object cloning with Lodash clone vs cloneDeep vs merge vs ES6 object spread vs ES6 Object.assign VS JSON.parse
Object cloning with Lodash clone vs cloneDeep vs merge vs ES6 object spread vs ES6 Object.assign vs structuredClone
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?