Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
anonmyous vs named
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
named vs anonymous
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
named
function a (){}
anonymous
var a = function(){}
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
named
anonymous
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **Overview** The benchmark is testing two approaches to defining functions in JavaScript: named function expressions and anonymous function expressions. **Options Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **Named Function Expressions**: This approach defines a function using the `function` keyword followed by the function name. For example: ```javascript function foo() {} ``` 2. **Anonymous Function Expressions**: This approach defines a function without a name, typically using an arrow function or the `var`, `let`, or `const` keywords with no explicit function declaration. For example: ```javascript var foo = function() {}; ``` **Pros and Cons** 1. **Named Function Expressions**: * Pros: Can be more readable, especially for simple functions. * Cons: May lead to naming conflicts if multiple variables have the same name. 2. **Anonymous Function Expressions**: * Pros: No naming conflicts, can be concise. * Cons: May make code harder to read and understand, especially for complex logic. **Library Usage** None of the provided benchmark test cases use any external libraries. **Special JavaScript Features/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being used in these benchmark test cases. They only use standard JavaScript basics. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to add more complexity to this benchmark, you could consider adding additional options, such as: * Using arrow functions (e.g., `() => {}`) * Using the `class` keyword instead of function expressions * Comparing the performance of different variable declarations (e.g., `var`, `let`, `const`) * Adding more complex function logic or nesting to the test cases By exploring these additional options, you could gather more insights into how JavaScript engines optimize and execute functions in different scenarios. For this specific benchmark, it's clear that named function expressions are slightly faster than anonymous function expressions on the provided hardware configuration. This might be due to various reasons such as name lookup or caching optimizations applied by the JavaScript engine.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery.each() vs Array.prototype.forEach()
Word width calculation speed
Lodash orderBy vs array.prototype.sort string
localeCompare vs function on array sort
jQuery $.each() vs Array.prototype.forEach()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?