Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object clone vs For loopdasdsadas
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
For loop vs Clone
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id=''></div>
Tests:
For loop
const orderTracking = {}; const styleSet = [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]; for (const style of styleSet) { orderTracking[style] = {}; for (let j = 1; j <= 9; j++) { orderTracking[style][j] = 1; } }
Clone
const orderTracking = {}; const styleSet = [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]; const seed = { 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1, 4: 1, 5: 1, 6: 1, 7: 1, 8: 1, 9: 1 } for (const style of styleSet) { orderTracking[style] = { 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1, 4: 1, 5: 1, 6: 1, 7: 1, 8: 1, 9: 1 } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
For loop
Clone
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by a JSON object with several properties: * `Name`: The name of the benchmark, which in this case is "Object clone vs For loopdasdsadas". * `Description`: An optional description of the benchmark. * `Script Preparation Code`: An optional script that runs before the test. In this case, it's empty. * `Html Preparation Code`: An optional HTML code that sets up a container for the test. In this case, it's `<div id=''></div>`. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **For loop** * The benchmark definition is a JavaScript script that creates an object `orderTracking` and initializes its properties using a for loop. * The script also initializes another object `styleSet` with 11 elements, which is used to access the properties of `orderTracking`. 2. **Clone** * The benchmark definition is a JavaScript script that creates an object `seed` with nested properties, similar to `orderTracking` in the For loop test case. * However, instead of using a for loop, it uses the spread operator (`{...}`) to create a new object `orderTracking`. **What's being tested** The benchmark is testing two approaches: 1. **For loop**: The script uses a traditional for loop to initialize the properties of `orderTracking`. This approach can be slower than other methods because it involves iteration and condition checks. 2. **Clone**: The script uses the spread operator (`{...}`) to create a new object `orderTracking`, which is faster than using a for loop. **Options compared** The benchmark is comparing two options: 1. **For loop**: A traditional approach that uses a for loop to initialize properties. 2. **Clone**: A more modern approach that uses the spread operator (`{...}`) to create a new object. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * **For loop** + Pros: - Easy to understand and implement - Can be optimized with early returns, caching, or other techniques + Cons: - May be slower due to iteration and condition checks * **Clone** + Pros: - Faster than traditional for loops - More concise and expressive syntax + Cons: - Less intuitive for some developers who are not familiar with spread operators **Library used** In both test cases, the `seed` object uses nested properties to create a similar structure to `orderTracking`. The library used here is not explicitly mentioned, but it's likely that JavaScript's built-in objects and syntax are being utilized. **Special JS feature or syntax:** The use of the spread operator (`{...}`) in the Clone test case introduces a modern JavaScript feature. This syntax allows for creating new objects by copying existing properties, which can be faster than using traditional methods like `Object.assign()` or for loops. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to the For loop approach include: * **Array.prototype.forEach()**: A more concise way to iterate over an array and access elements. * **Array.prototype.reduce()**: A method that applies a function to each element in an array, reducing it to a single output value. * **Object.assign()**: A method that copies properties from one object to another. Keep in mind that the choice of alternative depends on the specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Object cloning with Lodash clone vs cloneDeep vs merge vs ES6 object spread vs ES6 Object.assign vs Clone
RFDC vs. Object Assign
Object cloning with Lodash clone vs cloneDeep vs merge vs assign vs ES6 object spread vs ES6 Object.assign AWD AWd AWd AWd AWd Wd AW d
JS Cloning benchmarking
Lodash clone deep object array vs string array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?