Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
saddasdasadasdasd
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash merge vs classiuz merge
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
lodash merge
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = _.merge(a, b);
classiuz merge
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; const mergeObject = (target, source) => { const newSourceEntries = Object.entries(source).map(([key, value]) => { return [key, typeof value === 'object' ? {...target[key], ...value} : value] }) const newSource = Object.fromEntries(newSourceEntries) return {...target, ...newSource} } var c = mergeObject(a, b);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash merge
classiuz merge
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark JSON, explain what's being tested, and discuss the pros and cons of each approach. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition represents a JavaScript microbenchmark. It consists of: 1. **Name**: A unique identifier for the benchmark. 2. **Description**: An optional description of the benchmark (empty in this case). 3. **Script Preparation Code**: An optional code snippet to prepare the test environment (also empty in this case). 4. **Html Preparation Code**: A JavaScript file is included from a CDN, which likely provides utility functions for testing, including `_.merge` from Lodash. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two test cases: 1. **Lodash Merge**: The benchmark definition uses the `_.merge()` function from Lodash to merge two objects. 2. **Classiuz Merge**: The second test case defines a custom `mergeObject` function, which merges two objects by recursively iterating over source entries and updating target keys. **What's Being Tested** The benchmark is testing the performance of: * Lodash's `_.merge()` function * A custom implementation of object merge using a recursive function (`classiuz merge`) **Options Compared** In this case, there are two options being compared: 1. **Lodash Merge**: Using an existing library (Lodash) to perform the merge operation. 2. **Classiuz Merge**: Implementing a custom solution using a recursive function. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Lodash Merge:** Pros: * Well-tested and optimized by the Lodash team * Likely to provide better performance due to its implementation Cons: * Requires including an additional library (Lodash) * May introduce dependencies not present in the test environment **Classiuz Merge:** Pros: * Custom solution, which might be more efficient or suitable for specific use cases * No external dependencies Cons: * Custom implementation may have performance overhead due to its recursive nature * May require additional maintenance and testing **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the trade-offs between performance, maintainability, and dependency management. If you need a well-tested and optimized solution, Lodash might be a better choice. However, if you're looking for a custom implementation with no external dependencies, Classiuz Merge could be a suitable option. **Alternative Solutions** If you're interested in exploring other approaches, consider the following: 1. **Built-in JavaScript methods**: You can use built-in JavaScript methods like `Object.assign()` or spread operators (`{ ...a, ...b }`) to merge objects. 2. **Other libraries or frameworks**: Depending on your specific needs, you might find a more suitable library or framework that provides an efficient object merge implementation. Keep in mind that the choice of approach ultimately depends on your project's requirements and constraints.
Related benchmarks:
isEmpty vs. vanilla
Last Lodash Test
asdasdjkh askjdjkasdkjasd
Lodash vs Ramda fromPairs
lodash vs radash 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?