Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JavaScript sdfsdfds performance1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
Using the spread operator
const returnValue = {}; const obj = { SampleData: 'Hello world', MoreData: 'foo bar', SampleData1: 'Hello world', MoreData1: 'foo bar', SampleData2: 'Hello world', MoreData2: 'foo bar', SampleData3: 'Hello world', MoreData3: 'foo bar', SampleData4: 'Hello world', MoreData4: 'foo bar', SampleData5: 'Hello world', MoreData5: 'foo bar', SampleData6: 'Hello world', MoreData6: 'foo bar', SampleData7: 'Hello world', MoreData7: 'foo bar', SampleData8: 'Hello world', MoreData8: 'foo bar', SampleData9: 'Hello world', MoreData9: 'foo bar', SampleData0: 'Hello world', MoreData0: 'foo bar', }; for (const key in obj) { if (_.has(obj, key)) { returnValue[key.charAt(0).toLowerCase() + key.slice(1)] = obj[key]; } }
Using Object.assign
const returnValue = {}; const obj = { SampleData: 'Hello world', MoreData: 'foo bar', SampleData1: 'Hello world', MoreData1: 'foo bar', SampleData2: 'Hello world', MoreData2: 'foo bar', SampleData3: 'Hello world', MoreData3: 'foo bar', SampleData4: 'Hello world', MoreData4: 'foo bar', SampleData5: 'Hello world', MoreData5: 'foo bar', SampleData6: 'Hello world', MoreData6: 'foo bar', SampleData7: 'Hello world', MoreData7: 'foo bar', SampleData8: 'Hello world', MoreData8: 'foo bar', SampleData9: 'Hello world', MoreData9: 'foo bar', SampleData0: 'Hello world', MoreData0: 'foo bar', }; for (const key in obj) { if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) { returnValue[key[0].toLowerCase() + key.slice(1)] = obj[key]; } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that provides metadata about the benchmark, including its name, description, script preparation code, and HTML preparation code. In this case, the benchmark is named "JavaScript performance" and it uses Lodash library. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Using the spread operator**: This test case defines a JavaScript object `obj` with multiple properties and then iterates over its keys using a for...in loop. It uses the spread operator to create a new object `returnValue`. The benchmark measures the execution time of this code. 2. **Using Object.assign**: This test case is similar to the previous one, but it uses the `Object.assign` method instead of the spread operator to create a new object `returnValue`. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare the performance of using the spread operator versus `Object.assign`. Both methods are used to create a new object by iterating over an existing object's keys and assigning values to a new object. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Using the spread operator**: * Pros: It is often considered more readable and concise than using `Object.assign`. * Cons: In older browsers that do not support the spread operator, it may be slower or not supported at all. 2. **Using Object.assign**: * Pros: It is widely supported in modern browsers and can be faster than the spread operator in some cases. * Cons: Some developers find it less readable than the spread operator. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides various utility functions, including `has` which is used in one of the benchmark test cases. The `has` function checks if an object has a specific property. **Special JS Features or Syntax** In this benchmark, there are no special features or syntaxes used, such as async/await, promises, or arrow functions. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark uses Chrome 114 browser and Windows operating system. * The benchmark measures the execution time of each test case in executions per second. * The benchmark results can be used to compare the performance of different JavaScript libraries and coding styles. **Alternatives** If you want to write similar benchmarks, you can use other testing frameworks like Jest or Mocha, or other benchmarking tools like Benchmark.js. You can also use online benchmarking platforms like JSPerf or MicroBenchmarks.
Related benchmarks:
Ramda vs. Lodash vs Fastest Clone
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash vs Immutable) with lambda function
Last element (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash)
Lodash partition VS native reduce (with Lodash actually loaded)
Object.values vs lodash values
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?