Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Call Array vs Object
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object vs Array
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object
var list = {}; var aux; for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { list[i] = 'Testing...'; aux = list.i; }
Array
var list = {}; var aux; for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { list[i] = 'Testing...'; aux = list[i]; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object
Array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explore what is being tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations. **What is being tested?** The test case compares two approaches to populate an array/object with 10,000 elements: 1. **Object**: The benchmark defines a variable `aux` and assigns it the value of `list[i]`. However, this line has a syntax error (`aux = list.i;`). The correct code should be `aux = list[i];`. 2. **Array**: The benchmark simply assigns values to each index of the `list` array. **Options compared** The two options being tested are: 1. Using an object (`list`) with explicit indexing (`list[i]`) 2. Using an array (`list`) with implicit indexing (`aux = list[i];`) **Pros and cons** * **Object approach**: Pros: + Can be useful when working with complex data structures or objects that need to be manipulated dynamically. + May be more memory-efficient than arrays for large datasets. * Cons: + Requires explicit indexing, which can lead to slower performance due to the overhead of accessing object properties. + May cause issues if the property names are not properly defined or are dynamic. * **Array approach**: Pros: + Faster performance due to direct access to elements using integer indices. + More intuitive and concise syntax than objects for simple indexing. * Cons: + Less memory-efficient than objects for large datasets, as each element has a separate object reference. + May lead to issues if the array is not properly initialized or resized. **Library used** None explicitly mentioned in this example. However, it's worth noting that both objects and arrays are built-in JavaScript data structures. **Special JS feature/syntax** The test case uses the `var` keyword for variable declarations, which was a common convention before ES6 (2015). In modern JavaScript, you can use `let` or `const` instead. Additionally, the test case does not use any arrow functions (`=>`) or template literals (`${}`), which are also modern syntax features. **Other considerations** When running benchmarks like this one, consider the following: * Use a consistent testing environment to ensure fair results. * Optimize code for performance by reducing unnecessary computations and memory allocations. * Test with different inputs sizes and edge cases to get a comprehensive understanding of each approach's behavior. * Profile the benchmarking script itself to identify potential bottlenecks or issues. **Alternatives** Other data structures you can use in JavaScript include: 1. **Maps**: Similar to objects but optimized for fast lookups and insertion operations. 2. **Sets**: Unordered collections of unique values, ideal for fast membership testing. 3. **Sparse arrays**: Arrays that store only non-zero elements, useful for reducing memory usage. When choosing a data structure or approach, consider the trade-offs between performance, memory usage, and complexity.
Related benchmarks:
ruse js object vs array
Array.prototype.push vs Array.prototype.push.apply
Object.fromEntries vs create temp object
isarray_vs_instanceof_vs_tostring
Array isArray vs Object.prototype
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?