Benchmark: Proxy vs Object vs Object.setPrototypeOf vs Object.create

Script Preparation code:

window.basic = {a : 1, b: 2};
window.proxy = new Proxy({a : 1, b: 2}, {get : (t, p) => t[p]})
window.proto = Object.setPrototypeOf({}, {a : 1, b: 2})
window.create = Object.assign(Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf({})), {a : 1, b: 2})

Tests:

Basic
let a = basic.a; let b = basic.b;
Proxy
let a = proxy.a; let b = proxy.b;
Proto
let a = proto.a; let b = proto.b;
Object.create
let a = create.a; let b = create.b;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Basic
Proxy
Proto
Object.create

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 133 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Proto

109.0M/s

Object.create

100.6M/s

Basic

78.9M/s

Proxy

10.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Proto	109,049,048 Ops/sec
Object.create	100,598,160 Ops/sec
Basic	78,862,568 Ops/sec
Proxy	10,050,812 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, compared options, their pros and cons, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition**

The test case measures the performance difference between four different approaches to create an object with similar properties:

1. **Proxy**: A proxy object created using the `Proxy` constructor.
2. **Object**: An object created directly using the `{}` syntax.
3. **Proto**: An object created by setting its prototype using `Object.setPrototypeOf`.
4. **Object.create**: An object created using `Object.assign` and `Object.create`.

**Test Cases**

The test case consists of four individual tests, each measuring the performance of one approach:

1. **Basic**: Measures the performance of directly creating an object with properties `a` and `b`.
2. **Proxy**: Measures the performance of creating a proxy object with properties `a` and `b`.
3. **Proto**: Measures the performance of setting the prototype of an object to create it with properties `a` and `b`.
4. **Object.create**: Measures the performance of using `Object.assign` and `Object.create` to create an object with properties `a` and `b`.

**Library Used:**

* No external libraries are used in this benchmark.

**Special JS Features/Syntax:**

None mentioned.

**Other Considerations:**

* The benchmark measures executions per second, which is a common metric for performance testing.
* The test cases are designed to be independent, allowing for a fair comparison of the four approaches.
* The use of `Object.setPrototypeOf` and `Object.assign` provides a way to create objects with similar properties without having to duplicate code.

**Pros and Cons:**

1. **Proxy**:
	* Pros: Provides a way to create objects with complex behaviors using a callback function.
	* Cons: Can introduce additional overhead due to the creation of a proxy object.
2. **Object**:
	* Pros: Simple and straightforward, creates an object directly without any overhead.
	* Cons: May not be suitable for all use cases where more complex behavior is required.
3. **Proto**:
	* Pros: Allows for fine-grained control over the creation of objects by setting their prototype.
	* Cons: Can be error-prone if not used correctly, and may introduce additional overhead due to the creation of a new object.
4. **Object.create**:
	* Pros: Provides a way to create objects with similar properties using `Object.assign`, which can be more efficient than creating objects directly.
	* Cons: May require additional setup and configuration, and can be less intuitive for some developers.

In general, the choice of approach depends on the specific use case and requirements. For simple cases where direct object creation is sufficient, **Object** may be the most suitable option. For more complex scenarios where custom behavior or manipulation of properties is required, **Proxy**, **Proto**, or **Object.create** might be a better fit.

Other alternatives that could be used to create objects with similar properties include:

* Using a constructor function to create objects.
* Using a class-based approach (e.g., with ES6 classes) to create objects.
* Utilizing other library functions, such as `lodash`'s `assign` or `cloneDeep`, to create objects.

However, the choice of alternative depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the project.

Proxy vs Object vs Object.setPrototypeOf vs Object.create (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `Basic vs Proxy vs Proto vs Object.create`

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Basic

Proxy

Proto

Object.create

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Proxy vs Object vs Object.setPrototypeOf vs Object.create (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Basic vs Proxy vs Proto vs Object.create

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Basic

Proxy

Proto

Object.create

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Basic vs Proxy vs Proto vs Object.create`