Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
aliali
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
nested loops vs set way
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
nested loops
const array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1]; let flag = false const truth = () => { for (i = 0; i < array.length ,!flag; i++) for (j = 0; j < array.length; j++) array[i] == array[j] && (flag = true); }; truth()
set way
const array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1]; const truth = () => { let settedArray = new Set(array) return settedArray.size == array.length } truth()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
nested loops
set way
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmarking data and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The JSON file represents a JavaScript microbenchmark. It consists of two main parts: 1. **Script Preparation Code**: This is an empty string, indicating that no code needs to be executed before running the benchmark. 2. **Html Preparation Code**: Also an empty string, suggesting that no HTML preparation code is required. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: **Test Case 1: "nested loops"** This test case uses a JavaScript function `truth()` with nested loops: ```javascript const array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1]; let flag = false; const truth = () => { for (i = 0; i < array.length; !flag; i++) { for (j = 0; j < array.length; j++) array[i] == array[j] && (flag = true); } }; truth(); ``` The purpose of this function is to iterate through the `array` and check if each element is equal to itself at some point in the iteration. The flag variable is used to exit the loop early when the condition is met. **Test Case 2: "set way"** This test case uses a JavaScript function `truth()` with a `Set` data structure: ```javascript const array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1]; const truth = () => { let settedArray = new Set(array); return settedArray.size == array.length; }; truth(); ``` The purpose of this function is to create a `Set` from the `array` and check if its size matches the original array length. **Comparison** In both test cases, the goal is to execute the benchmarked code multiple times and measure the execution time. However, the approaches differ: * **Nested Loops**: The traditional nested loop approach, which can be slow due to unnecessary iterations. * **Set Way**: Using a `Set` data structure to efficiently check for equality between elements. **Pros and Cons** * **Nested Loops**: + Pros: Simple implementation, easy to understand. + Cons: Can be slow due to unnecessary iterations, may not scale well for large datasets. * **Set Way**: + Pros: Efficient, fast execution time, scalable. + Cons: May require additional memory allocation for the `Set` data structure. **Library and Special Features** There is no specific library mentioned in the benchmarking data. However, the use of `Set` data structure is a built-in JavaScript feature that provides efficient membership testing. **Other Considerations** When writing benchmarks, it's essential to consider the following: * **Warm-up period**: Ensure that the benchmarked code has enough time to warm up before measuring execution times. * **Data size and complexity**: Choose a dataset size and complexity that allows for accurate measurements without overwhelming the system resources. * **Randomization and variability**: Consider adding randomization or variability to the input data to make the benchmarks more realistic and representative of real-world scenarios. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for benchmarking JavaScript code include: * V8 Benchmark Suite (part of Google's Chromium project) * WebKit Benchmarks * Node.js Performance Benchmarks These benchmarks focus on different aspects of JavaScript performance, such as garbage collection, compilation, and execution.
Related benchmarks:
Array push vs spread operator vs concat
Empty Array push vs spread operator
array order lodash vs vanilla
lodash some vs native array some
lodash.uniq vs native Set (multi array)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?