Benchmark: Compare jQuery 3.7.0 vs 3.6.0 performance

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.7.0.min.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
    var jq370 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src='https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
    var jq360 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div id="testElement"></div>

Tests:

jQuery 3.7.0
var element = jq370('#testElement'); element.removeClass('test-class'); element.addClass('test-class'); element.removeClass('test-class');
jQuery 3.6.0
var element = jq360('#testElement'); element.removeClass('test-class'); element.addClass('test-class'); element.removeClass('test-class');

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 16 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 16 runs

jQuery 3.6.0

417K/s

jQuery 3.7.0

358K/s

Fastest: jQuery 3.6.0 (1.2x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ jQuery 3.6.0: 417,194 ops/sec
• jQuery 3.7.0: 357,662 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
jQuery 3.7.0
jQuery 3.6.0

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 137 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

jQuery 3.6.0

674K/s

jQuery 3.7.0

585K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ jQuery 3.6.0	673,810 Ops/sec
jQuery 3.7.0	584,732 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered.

**Benchmark Purpose**

The test aims to compare the performance of two versions of jQuery: jQuery 3.7.0 and jQuery 3.6.0. Specifically, it measures the execution time of removing and adding a class called "test-class" from an HTML element using both versions of the library.

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **jQuery 3.7.0**: The latest version of jQuery being tested.
2. **jQuery 3.6.0**: An older version of jQuery used for comparison.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach:**

* **jQuery 3.7.0**:
	+ Pros:
		- Latest version, potentially with improved performance and new features.
		- May have better support for modern browsers and standards.
	+ Cons:
		- May introduce compatibility issues with older browsers or environments.
		- Might be more resource-intensive due to new features or optimizations.
* **jQuery 3.6.0**:
	+ Pros:
		- Less likely to introduce compatibility issues or resource-intensive changes.
		- May have better support for older browsers or environments.
	+ Cons:
		- Older version, potentially with reduced performance and fewer features.

**Library Usage**

The test uses the jQuery library in both versions. jQuery is a popular JavaScript library used for DOM manipulation, event handling, and other tasks. In this case, it's being used to manipulate an HTML element by removing and adding a class called "test-class".

**Special JS Feature or Syntax (None)**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

If not using jQuery, alternative DOM manipulation libraries might be considered:

* **Vanilla JavaScript**: Using native JavaScript methods to manipulate the DOM.
* **React**: A popular front-end library that uses a virtual DOM for efficient updates.
* **Angular**: Another popular front-end framework that uses a template engine and DOM manipulation.

Keep in mind that these alternatives would require significant changes to the benchmark code and might not provide comparable results.

Compare jQuery 3.7.0 vs 3.6.0 performance (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: jQuery 3.7.0 vs jQuery 3.6.0

Comparing performance of: `jQuery 3.7.0 vs jQuery 3.6.0`

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

jQuery 3.7.0

jQuery 3.6.0

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 16 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 16 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Compare jQuery 3.7.0 vs 3.6.0 performance (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: jQuery 3.7.0 vs jQuery 3.6.0

Comparing performance of: jQuery 3.7.0 vs jQuery 3.6.0

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

jQuery 3.7.0

jQuery 3.6.0

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 16 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 16 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `jQuery 3.7.0 vs jQuery 3.6.0`