Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array concat ES6
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its results. **What is tested?** The benchmark compares two approaches to concatenate an array in JavaScript: 1. The traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method, which takes multiple arrays as arguments and returns a new array containing all elements from both arrays. 2. The new ES6 spread operator (`...`), which allows for more concise and expressive array concatenation. **Options compared** The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches: * **Traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method**: This is the classic way to concatenate arrays in JavaScript, using the `concat()` method. * **ES6 spread operator (`...`)**: This is a new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 that allows for more concise and expressive array concatenation. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method**: + Pros: Well-established, widely supported, and easy to understand. + Cons: Can be slower than the spread operator due to the overhead of creating a new array and copying elements from the original arrays. * **ES6 spread operator (`...`)**: + Pros: More concise and expressive, reducing code duplication and improving readability. Can also lead to more efficient execution since it only creates a new array reference without actually copying data. + Cons: May not be supported in older browsers or environments that don't implement this feature. **Library usage** There is no library used in this benchmark. **Special JS features/syntax** The ES6 spread operator (`...`) is a special syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015, which allows for more concise and expressive array concatenation. This feature was added to provide a simpler way to create new arrays by expanding existing arrays into them. **Other alternatives** If you want to avoid using the `concat()` method or the spread operator, you could consider alternative approaches: * Using `Array.prototype.push()`: You can use `push()` to add elements to an array and then repeat this process for each element in the original array. * Using `Array.prototype.reduce()`: This method allows you to build a new array by reducing an initial value with each element in the original array. However, these alternatives may not be as efficient or readable as using the `concat()` method or the spread operator.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Concat vs Spread (Two Arrays)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?