HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 16 community runs

Desktop Results:
Chrome 16 runs
template
666/s
DOMParser
654/s
createContextualFragment
525/s
insertAdjacentHTML
501/s
innerHTML
495/s
createContextualFragment PolyFill
486/s

Fastest: template (1.4x faster)

View exact numbers
  • template: 666 ops/sec
  • DOMParser: 654 ops/sec
  • createContextualFragment: 525 ops/sec
  • insertAdjacentHTML: 501 ops/sec
  • innerHTML: 495 ops/sec
  • createContextualFragment PolyFill: 486 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    DOMParser
    createContextualFragment
    template
    innerHTML
    insertAdjacentHTML
    createContextualFragment PolyFill

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/145.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 145 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
template
1K/s
DOMParser
1K/s
createContextualFragment
1K/s
createContextualFragment PolyFill
1K/s
insertAdjacentHTML
1K/s
innerHTML
1K/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
template 1,304 Ops/sec
DOMParser 1,233 Ops/sec
createContextualFragment 1,078 Ops/sec
createContextualFragment PolyFill 1,029 Ops/sec
insertAdjacentHTML 1,029 Ops/sec
innerHTML 1,022 Ops/sec