Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Mix jquery & vanilla
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
mix vs jquery
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var $dragContainer = $("<div/>", { id: 'drag_img' })
Tests:
mix
if (!$dragContainer[0].hasChildNodes()) { console.log(1) }
jquery
if (!$dragContainer.children().length) { console.log(1) }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
mix
jquery
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition and Script Preparation Code** The benchmark definition represents a script that will be executed repeatedly to measure its performance. In this case, the script preparation code is: ```javascript var $dragContainer = $( `<div/>`, { id: 'drag_img' } ); ``` This code creates an empty `div` element with an ID of `'drag_img'`. The `$` symbol is a reference to jQuery's global object. This line of code sets up the test environment by defining a variable `$dragContainer` that will be used in the benchmark definition. **Html Preparation Code** The html preparation code: ```html <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script> ``` includes a reference to jQuery's CDN, which means that the browser will load jQuery from this URL instead of using its local copy. **Test Cases and Benchmark Definitions** There are two individual test cases in this benchmark: ### Test Case 1: "mix" The benchmark definition for this test case is: ```javascript if (!$dragContainer[0].hasChildNodes()) { console.log(1); } ``` This line of code checks if the `div` element created earlier has any child nodes. If it doesn't, it logs a value of 1 to the console. ### Test Case 2: "jquery" The benchmark definition for this test case is: ```javascript if (!$dragContainer.children().length) { console.log(1); } ``` This line of code checks if the `div` element created earlier has any child elements. If it doesn't, it logs a value of 1 to the console. **Library and Its Purpose** In both test cases, jQuery is used as a library to interact with the HTML document. The `$dragContainer.children()` method returns an array-like object containing all child elements of the `div` element, while the `.hasChildNodes()` method checks if the element has any child nodes (including text nodes). **Pros and Cons** * **Using `hasChildNodes()`**: This approach is straightforward and easy to understand. However, it may be slower than using a more efficient method like `$dragContainer.children().length`. * **Using `$dragContainer.children().length`**: This approach is generally faster because it directly checks the length of the child element array without iterating through its contents. **Other Considerations** * **DOM Manipulation**: Both test cases involve manipulating the DOM to create and check the presence of a `div` element. This can have performance implications if not done efficiently. * **Browser Variability**: The benchmark results may vary depending on the browser used, as different browsers may optimize or handle DOM manipulation differently. **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark definition.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery 3.3.1 slim by id vs Document.getElementById
Umbrella JS 2.10.3 vs Jquery 3.3.1
Umbrella JS 3.22 vs Jquery Slim 3.60
jQuery append vs html
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?