Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
flatMap() vs filter().map() vs map().filter()
(version: 0)
flatMap vs filter map
Comparing performance of:
filter().map() vs flatMap() vs map().filter(Boolean) vs map().filter(=>)
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; var i = 0; while (i <= 1E5) arr[i] = i++;
Tests:
filter().map()
arr.filter(x => x % 3).map(x => x/100)
flatMap()
arr.flatMap(x => x % 3 ? x/100 : [])
map().filter(Boolean)
arr.map(x => x % 3 ? x/100 : false).filter(Boolean)
map().filter(=>)
arr.map(x => x % 3 ? x/100 : false).filter(x => undefined !== x)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
filter().map()
flatMap()
map().filter(Boolean)
map().filter(=>)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Related benchmarks:
javascript array.filter().map() vs array.flatMap()
Array flatMap() vs filter().map()
flatMap() vs filter().map() - arrays
flatMap() vs filter().map() Bruno
comparing flatMap vs filter and map in little arr length
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?