Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Using the spread operator vs Object.assign
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using the spread operator vs Object.assign
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using the spread operator
Object.assign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Explanation** The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches for merging objects in JavaScript: using the spread operator (`...`) and `Object.assign()`. The test case consists of three steps: 1. Define two separate objects, `firstObject` and `secondObject`, with different properties. 2. Create a new object, `finalObject`, by either using the spread operator or `Object.assign()` to merge the properties of `firstObject` and `secondObject`. 3. The benchmark measures the execution time for each approach. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Using the Spread Operator (`...`)**: This syntax was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) as a way to merge objects using the spread operator. 2. **Object.assign()**: A built-in JavaScript function that merges properties from multiple sources into a single object. **Pros and Cons** * **Using the Spread Operator (`...`)**: + Pros: concise, readable, and modern syntax. + Cons: may have performance overhead due to its novelty and the need for TypeScript or other static analysis tools to optimize it. * **Object.assign()**: + Pros: widely supported, optimized by browsers, and easy to use. + Cons: less readable than the spread operator syntax, and can lead to errors if not used correctly. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark does not consider the size of the objects being merged. If the objects are very large, the performance difference between these two approaches might be negligible. * Other libraries or frameworks, such as Lodash or Underscore.js, may provide more efficient ways to merge objects. * Modern JavaScript engines often have built-in optimizations for `Object.assign()`, making it a good choice for most use cases. **Library and Syntax Explanation** In the benchmark's script preparation code, we can see that the library being used is not explicitly mentioned. However, the syntax used in the `Benchmark Definition` section suggests that modern JavaScript (ECMAScript 2015+) is assumed to be used. No special JavaScript features or syntax are mentioned in the provided benchmark setup. **Alternative Benchmarks** If you want to explore other alternatives for merging objects, consider the following: * **Lodash.merge()**: A popular utility library that provides a robust and efficient way to merge objects. * **Underscore.js.merge()**: Another well-known utility library that offers a simple and concise way to merge objects. * **Manual object iteration**: You can achieve similar results by using manual loops to iterate over the properties of `firstObject` and `secondObject` and assigning them to `finalObject`. By exploring these alternatives, you can gain a deeper understanding of the trade-offs involved in choosing different approaches for merging objects in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
Math.round()
toFixed vs Math.round() with numbers222
toFixed vs Math.round vs |(bitwise or)
Array.from vs Spread using 10000 elements
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?