Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash vs native group by test 1337
(version: 0)
lodash vs native group by
Comparing performance of:
native vs lodash
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var fieldMappings = { first_name: {formFieldName:'fieldname1', DNBMap:'dnbmap1'}, last_name: {formFieldName:'fieldname1', DNBMap:'dnbmap2'}, alias3: {formFieldName:'fieldname2', DNBMap:'dnbmap3'} } var response = { first_name: 'field1Valuefst', last_name: 'field1Valuelst', alias3: 'field2Value' } function nameFromResponse(response) { return Object .keys(response) .filter(key => key === 'first_name' || key === 'last_name') .map(key => response[key]).join(' '); }
Tests:
native
let massagedResponse = {}; let nameFieldName = fieldMappings.first_name.formFieldName; massagedResponse[nameFieldName] = nameFromResponse(response); Object.keys(response).filter(value => value !== 'first_name' && value !== 'last_name').forEach(key => { massagedResponse[fieldMappings[key].formFieldName] = response[key]; });
lodash
_(response) .mapValues(i=>{return{value: i}}) .merge(fieldMappings) .groupBy('formFieldName') .mapValues(j=>_.map(j, 'value').join(' ')) .value()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
native
lodash
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data to explain what's being tested and the different approaches used. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing two approaches: native JavaScript (using vanilla functions) and Lodash (a popular JavaScript utility library). The benchmark is testing the performance of these two approaches for grouping by a specific field in an object. **Script Preparation Code** This code defines a `fieldMappings` object, which maps form field names to DNBMap values. It also defines a `response` object with three fields: `first_name`, `last_name`, and `alias3`. The `nameFromResponse` function takes the response object as input and returns a string by concatenating the values of the `first_name` and `last_name` fields. **Html Preparation Code** This line includes the Lodash library from a CDN, which is used in one of the benchmark definitions. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Native**: This test case uses native JavaScript functions to group the response object by field mappings. It first extracts the values for `first_name` and `last_name`, then iterates over the remaining keys, mapping each key to its corresponding form field name and value. 2. **Lodash**: This test case uses Lodash's `groupBy` function to group the response object by field mappings. The `mapValues` function is used to create an object with mapped values, and then the `merge` function is used to combine this object with the original field mappings. **Pros and Cons** * **Native JavaScript**: + Pros: No external dependency on Lodash, potentially more familiar code for developers. + Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of explicit looping and mapping. * **Lodash**: + Pros: Often faster than native JavaScript due to optimized functions and caching. + Cons: Requires an additional external dependency (Lodash) and may have a steeper learning curve. **Library and Purpose** The `lodash` library is used for its `groupBy`, `mapValues`, `merge`, and other utility functions. The purpose of using Lodash in this benchmark is to provide a faster alternative to native JavaScript, while still maintaining compatibility with older browsers that may not support modern JavaScript features. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None are explicitly mentioned in the provided code. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring other alternatives for grouping objects by field mappings, here are some options: * **Moment.js**: A popular date and time library that also provides grouping functionality. * **Array.prototype.reduce()**: A built-in JavaScript function that can be used to group arrays by a specific property. * **Underscore.js**: Another popular utility library that provides similar functionality to Lodash. Note that the performance of these alternatives may vary depending on the specific use case and browser support.
Related benchmarks:
lodash (v4.17.15) map vs Object.keys map
Filter-Map: Lodash vs Native (smaller array
_.map vs. array.map for object
lodash _.map vs native map
lodash _.map vs native map true version
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?