Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test by Marek K.
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
A vs B
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
A
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; params = [...params, "C"];
B
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; params.push("C");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
A
B
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript snippet that creates an array `params` with three elements: two strings ("hello" and "C") and one boolean value (true). The script then uses either the spread operator (`...`) or the `push()` method to add another string element ("C") to the end of the array. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **A**: The benchmark definition is identical to the original, but instead of using the spread operator, it uses `params = [...params, "C"];`. This means that the script will attempt to use the spread operator to add a new element to the array. 2. **B**: The benchmark definition is similar to A, but instead of using the spread operator, it uses `params.push("C");`. This means that the script will attempt to use the `push()` method to add a new element to the end of the array. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This is a modern JavaScript feature that allows you to create a new array by spreading an existing array. 2. **Push Method**: This is an older, more traditional way of adding elements to an array. **Pros and Cons** **Spread Operator (`...`):** Pros: * More concise and expressive * Can be faster for large arrays (since it avoids the overhead of a function call) * Often preferred by modern JavaScript developers Cons: * Only works in modern browsers that support ES6+ features (e.g., Safari 16, Chrome 96+, Firefox 87+, Edge 99+) * May not work in older browsers or environments * Can be slower for very large arrays due to the overhead of creating a new array **Push Method:** Pros: * Widely supported across all modern and older browsers * Often considered more predictable and stable * Can be faster for small to medium-sized arrays (since it avoids the overhead of creating a new array) Cons: * Less concise and less expressive than the spread operator * May require more code to achieve the same result **Library Usage** Neither of the benchmark definitions uses any external libraries. The script is self-contained and only relies on built-in JavaScript features. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmarks, such as async/await, generators, or closures. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative ways to add elements to an array, there are a few other options: 1. `concat()`: This is another older method that concatenates two arrays and returns a new array with the combined elements. 2. `set()` (for modern browsers): This is a relatively new method introduced in ES6+ that allows you to set the length of an array and add elements at once. 3. `Array.prototype.push()`, `Array.prototype.unshift()`, or other methods: These are all part of the Array prototype and can be used to add elements to an array. In summary, the benchmark is comparing the performance of two different ways to add an element to an array in modern JavaScript: the spread operator (`...`) and the push method. The results provide insight into which approach is faster and more efficient across a range of browsers and devices.
Related benchmarks:
Copy and remove
somevfind
includes vs ifelse
Nested tenary vs dictionary
deep copy test123
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?