Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array map join vs toString fixed
(version: 2)
Array.toString vs array.join(',')
Comparing performance of:
1000 array toString vs 1000 array join
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
1000 array toString
let i = 1001; const strings = []; while (--i) { const index = i; strings.push(i.toString()) } strings.toString()
1000 array join
let i = 1001; const strings = []; while (--i) { const index = i; strings.push(i.toString()) } strings.join(',')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1000 array toString
1000 array join
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Purpose** The benchmark measures the performance of two different approaches to concatenate an array of strings in JavaScript: 1. `Array.prototype.toString()` 2. `Array.prototype.join()` with a fixed separator (in this case, a comma `,`) **Options Compared** We have two options being compared: A) `Array.prototype.toString()`: This method converts the entire array to a string using the `toString()` method of each element. B) `Array.prototype.join()`: This method concatenates all elements in the array into a single string, using the specified separator. **Pros and Cons** ### Array.prototype.toString() Pros: * Simple and straightforward * Does not require any additional setup or configuration Cons: * Can be slower than other methods for large arrays due to the overhead of converting each element to a string * May not work well with non-string elements in the array, as `toString()` will return the default string representation of that object (e.g., `[object Number]`) ### Array.prototype.join() Pros: * Can be faster than `toString()` for large arrays, especially when using a separator * Allows specifying a custom separator, which can improve readability and maintainability Cons: * Requires additional setup to specify the separator * May not work well with non-string elements in the array, as `join()` will attempt to concatenate them as strings **Library/External Dependency** There is no explicit library or external dependency mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that both methods rely on the built-in `Array.prototype` and string concatenation. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** None of the methods explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax. The benchmark focuses solely on the performance difference between these two array concatenation methods. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to concatenate an array of strings might include: * Using a custom loop to iterate over the array and append each element to a result string * Using `String.prototype.concat()` to concatenate all elements in the array (although this is generally slower than using `join()`) * Using a third-party library or function specifically designed for string concatenation, such as Lodash's ` _.times()` method These alternative approaches would likely have different performance characteristics and trade-offs compared to the two methods being benchmarked.
Related benchmarks:
JSON.strigify vs array.join
array join vs toString js
Array<string>.join vs Array<string>.reduce
array join('.') vs toString js
array.join(",") vs array.ToString()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?