Benchmark: chain of or equals vs includes vs equal to many things

Script Preparation code:

var stringToMatch = 'hello';

Tests:

Array.includes
['banana', 'map', 'cloth', 'hello', 'person'].includes(stringToMatch)
Or chain
stringToMatch === 'banana' || stringToMatch === 'map' || stringToMatch === 'cloth' || stringToMatch === 'hello' || stringToMatch === 'person'
Or chain of equality
stringToMatch === ('banana' || 'map' || 'cloth' || 'hello'|| 'person')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.includes
Or chain
Or chain of equality

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 123 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Or chain of equality

9.3M/s

Array.includes

7.1M/s

Or chain

2.5M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Or chain of equality	9,296,598 Ops/sec
Array.includes	7,106,846 Ops/sec
Or chain	2,503,412 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark is designed to measure the performance difference between three approaches:

1. `Array.includes` (the original approach)
2. A chain of logical ORs (`stringToMatch === 'banana' || stringToMatch === 'map' || ...`)
3. A single expression using the OR operator with equality checks (`stringToMatch === ('banana' || 'map' || ...')`)

**Options being compared:**

* `Array.includes`: This is a built-in method in JavaScript that checks if a specific value exists in an array.
* Chain of logical ORs: This approach uses multiple OR operators to check if the `stringToMatch` variable matches any of the values in the array.
* Single expression using OR operator with equality checks: This approach uses a single expression to achieve the same result as the chain of logical ORs.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. `Array.includes`:
	* Pros: Efficient, simple, and widely supported.
	* Cons: May not be optimized for performance in all browsers or situations.
2. Chain of logical ORs:
	* Pros: Can be useful when the array contains a small number of values.
	* Cons: Can lead to slower performance due to the need for multiple checks.
3. Single expression using OR operator with equality checks:
	* Pros: Combines the benefits of both approaches, potentially offering better performance and readability.
	* Cons: May not be as widely supported or optimized as `Array.includes`.

**Library usage:**

None explicitly mentioned in this benchmark.

**Special JS feature/syntax:**

The use of template literals (`\r\n\t`) is a recent syntax feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015. It allows embedding expressions inside string literals, making it easier to write readable code.

**Benchmark preparation code and test cases:**

The script preparation code defines a single variable `stringToMatch` with the value `'hello'`.

Each test case defines a different benchmark:

1. The first test case uses `Array.includes` to check if the `stringToMatch` value exists in an array containing several values.
2. The second test case uses a chain of logical ORs to achieve the same result as the previous test case.
3. The third test case uses a single expression using the OR operator with equality checks to achieve the same result.

**Other alternatives:**

If you wanted to explore alternative approaches, you could consider:

* Using `some()` method instead of `Array.includes`, which can be more efficient in certain cases.
* Utilizing specialized libraries or frameworks for benchmarking JavaScript performance.
* Implementing a custom solution using bitwise operations or other optimization techniques.

chain of or equals vs includes vs equal to many things (version: 0)

how much of a performance deficit you can expect from using Array.includes instead of manually writing a chain of logical ORs

Comparing performance of: `Array.includes vs Or chain vs Or chain of equality`

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Array.includes

Or chain

Or chain of equality

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

chain of or equals vs includes vs equal to many things (version: 0)

how much of a performance deficit you can expect from using Array.includes instead of manually writing a chain of logical ORs

Comparing performance of: Array.includes vs Or chain vs Or chain of equality

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Array.includes

Or chain

Or chain of equality

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Array.includes vs Or chain vs Or chain of equality`