Benchmark: NEW VS CACHED - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var tab = [];

function cached(){
	tab[0] = Math.random();
  	tab[1] = Math.random();
  	tab[2] = Math.random();
  	tab[3] = Math.random();
}

function neww(){
	return [
      Math.random(),
      Math.random(),
  	  Math.random(),
      Math.random()
    ];
}

Tests:

CACHED
for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { cached(); }
NEW
for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { neww(); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
CACHED
NEW

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

Cache global vs reference
For vs Min
For vs Min1
Array.find vs. Map.get fork

NEW VS CACHED (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: CACHED vs NEW

Created: 8 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

CACHED

NEW

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results