Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
object spread vs immutable-js merge 4.3.0
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
object spread vs immutable-js
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/immutable/4.3.0/immutable.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/immutability-helper@2.7.0/index.min.js"></script>
Tests:
object spread
let obj = {}; for(i=0;i<100;i++){ const key = 'key'+i const value = 'value'+i obj = {...obj, [key]: {key, value}} }
immutable-js
let obj = Immutable.Map(); for(i=0;i<100;i++){ const key = 'key'+i const value = 'value'+i obj = obj.merge({key: {key, value}}) }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
object spread
immutable-js
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The website uses JSON to define the benchmark, which includes the following: * `Name`: The name of the benchmark, which is "object spread vs immutable-js merge 4.3.0". * `Description` and `Script Preparation Code` are empty, indicating that there's no description provided, and no special script preparation code needed. * `Html Preparation Code` includes links to two external libraries: Immutable.js (version 4.3.0) and Immutability Helper (version 2.7.0). These libraries will be used in the benchmark. **Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two test cases, each with a different approach: 1. **Object Spread**: The first test case uses JavaScript's object spread operator (`{...obj, [key]: {key, value}}`) to add a new property to an existing object. 2. **Immutable-js**: The second test case uses the Immutable.js library (version 4.3.0) and its `merge` function to add a new property to an existing Map object. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two approaches: * **Object Spread**: This approach uses JavaScript's built-in object spread operator to modify the object. * **Immutable-js**: This approach uses the Immutable.js library to create a new Map object and merge it with the original object. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: ### Object Spread Pros: * Easy to understand and use * Fast and efficient (since it's built-in JavaScript) Cons: * Creates a new object, potentially leading to memory issues if not done carefully * Can be less predictable in certain scenarios, such as when dealing with nested objects or arrays ### Immutable-js Pros: * Provides a more explicit and predictable way of modifying immutable data structures * Reduces the risk of memory issues since data is never modified directly Cons: * Requires additional library inclusion * May have performance overhead due to the creation of new, isolated data structures **Other Considerations** When choosing between these approaches, consider the following factors: * **Predictability**: If predictability and safety are critical for your use case, Immutable-js might be a better choice. However, if ease of use and speed are more important, object spread might be sufficient. * **Memory Efficiency**: If memory efficiency is a concern, Immutable-js might be a better option since it avoids creating new objects in place. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in these test cases. Both approaches rely on standard JavaScript features. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, consider the following options: * **Lodash**: Lodash provides a `merge` function that can be used to merge objects in a similar way to Immutable-js. * **JavaScript's `Array.prototype.push()` and object's `setItem()` methods**: These methods can be used to add properties to an object or array, although they might not provide the same level of predictability as Immutable-js. I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark definition and test cases!
Related benchmarks:
object spread vs immutable-js set vs object mutate
object spread vs immutable-js set (large)
Spread operator vs Immutable.js performance for common use cases
object spread vs immutable-js set vs es6 set
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?