Benchmark: Dompurify vs sanitize-html latest

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/sanitize-html@1/dist/sanitize-html.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dompurify/dist/purify.min.js"></script>

Tests:

DOMPurify
const testString = ` Welcome to safeland <a href='javascript:alert(1)'>This is fun</a> <img src=x onerror=console.log(1)> `; const result = DOMPurify.sanitize(testString);
Sanitize HTML
const testString = ` Welcome to safeland <a href='javascript:alert(1)'>This is fun</a> <img src=x onerror=console.log(1)> `; const result = sanitizeHtml(testString);

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 13 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 13 runs

Sanitize HTML

106K/s

DOMPurify

33K/s

Fastest: Sanitize HTML (3.2x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Sanitize HTML: 105,821 ops/sec
• DOMPurify: 32,771 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
DOMPurify
Sanitize HTML

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/142.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Sanitize HTML

105K/s

DOMPurify

18K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Sanitize HTML	105,385 Ops/sec
DOMPurify	18,118 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is designed to compare two JavaScript libraries: DOMPurify and sanitize-html. Both libraries are used to sanitize HTML strings, which means they remove or escape malicious code from user-inputted data to prevent XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) attacks.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark tests the performance of both libraries on a specific input string that contains various types of HTML tags and attributes, including:

* `` and ` ` tags
* An `<a>` tag with a `href` attribute that uses JavaScript code (`javascript:alert(1)`)
* An `<img>` tag with a `src` attribute set to "x" (which will trigger an error) and an `onerror` event handler that logs a message to the console

**Library Descriptions**

1. **DOMPurify**: DOMPurify is a lightweight JavaScript library developed by Mozilla. It's designed to sanitize HTML strings by removing or escaping malicious code, such as script tags and inline styles. DOMPurify is often used in web applications that handle user-inputted data.
2. **sanitize-html**: sanitize-html is another popular JavaScript library for sanitizing HTML strings. It provides a more comprehensive set of features than DOMPurify, including support for custom sanitizer functions.

**Pros and Cons**

* **DOMPurify**:
	+ Pros: Lightweight, easy to use, and well-maintained.
	+ Cons: May not provide the same level of customization as sanitize-html.
* **sanitize-html**:
	+ Pros: Provides more features and flexibility than DOMPurify, including custom sanitizer functions.
	+ Cons: Heavier and potentially slower than DOMPurify.

**Other Considerations**

When choosing a library for sanitizing HTML strings, consider factors such as:

* Performance: Both libraries are optimized for speed, but sanitize-html may have a slight performance advantage due to its more comprehensive feature set.
* Customization: If you need to customize the sanitization process or support specific use cases, sanitize-html might be a better choice.
* Complexity: DOMPurify is generally considered easier to use and understand, while sanitize-html has a steeper learning curve.

**Special JS Features**

The benchmark does not mention any special JavaScript features or syntax. The input strings and library functions are straightforward and do not rely on advanced JavaScript features.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative libraries for sanitizing HTML strings, consider:

* **js-sanitize**: A lightweight JavaScript library that provides a simple and easy-to-use API.
* **DOMPurify alternatives**: There are several other DOMPurify-like libraries available, such as **sanitize-html**'s own `purify` function or **html-minifier**, which is a separate project focused on minimizing HTML strings.

I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark and choose the right library for your use case!

Dompurify vs sanitize-html latest (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `DOMPurify vs Sanitize HTML`

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

DOMPurify

Sanitize HTML

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 13 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 13 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Dompurify vs sanitize-html latest (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: DOMPurify vs Sanitize HTML

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

DOMPurify

Sanitize HTML

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 13 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 13 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `DOMPurify vs Sanitize HTML`