Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator vs mapsss
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional slice() method and map() method
Comparing performance of:
spread operator vs map
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread operator
const params = [null, null, null, null] const filtered = [...params.slice(0, 2), true, ...params.slice(2 + 1)]
map
const params = [null, null, null, null] const filtered = params.map((item, index) => index === 2 ? true : null );
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread operator
map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark compares three different approaches to manipulate an array: 1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This is a new ES6 syntax that allows you to create a new array by spreading out elements from an existing array. 2. **`slice()` method**: This is a traditional JavaScript method that returns a shallow copy of a portion of an array. 3. **`map()` method**: This is a functional programming approach that creates a new array by applying a transformation function to each element in the original array. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches: * Spread Operator (`...`) * `slice()` method * `map()` method **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: * Pros: concise, readable, and efficient. * Cons: may be slower than traditional methods due to the overhead of creating a new array. 2. **`slice()` method**: * Pros: widely supported, easy to use, and fast. * Cons: can be verbose and less readable for complex filtering operations. 3. **`map()` method**: * Pros: functional programming approach is elegant, expressive, and efficient. * Cons: may require additional memory allocation, making it slower than spread operator. **Library/Functionality Used** None of the test cases explicitly use a library or function beyond the standard JavaScript methods mentioned above. However, if we consider the `map()` method's transformation function in the benchmark definition: ```javascript (index === 2 ? true : null) ``` This is not a built-in function but rather a simple conditional expression that replaces each element at index 2 with `true` and other elements with `null`. This syntax is valid JavaScript, but its performance may be affected by the CPU's ability to execute constant-time arithmetic. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches could be: * Using `Array.prototype.reduce()` instead of `map()` * Employing more advanced filtering techniques like `filter()` or `every()` with a custom predicate function * Utilizing SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) instructions for performance-critical sections However, these alternatives are not explicitly tested in the provided benchmark definition. In summary, the test case compares the performance of three approaches to manipulate an array: spread operator, `slice()` method, and `map()` method. The pros and cons of each approach are discussed, along with considerations like readability, memory allocation, and CPU execution time.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator With slightly bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator on a bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator - large array 100000
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator performance
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator 73 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?