Benchmark: radash pick vs object descturct

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rayepps/radash/master/cdn/radash.js'></script>

Tests:

Radash
const obj = { a:1, b:1, c:1, d:1, e:1, f:1, g:1, h:1, i:1, } const n = _.pick(obj, ['a','d','i']);
Object desctruct
const obj = { a:1, b:1, c:1, d:1, e:1, f:1, g:1, h:1, i:1, } const {a, d, i} = obj; const n = {a, d, i};

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Radash
Object desctruct

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Radash	3097994.0 Ops/sec
Object desctruct	216936848.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents two JavaScript microbenchmarks:

1. **Radash**: This benchmark tests the performance of the `radash` library, which provides a simple way to create objects with a subset of properties using the `pick` function.
2. **Object destructuring**: This benchmark tests the performance of object destructuring, where an object's properties are extracted into separate variables.

**Options compared**

In both benchmarks, two options are being compared:

1. **Radash**: The `radash` library is used to create an object with a subset of properties using the `pick` function.
2. **Object destructuring**: Object destructuring is used to extract specific properties from the original object into separate variables.

**Pros and cons of each approach**

**Radash:**

Pros:

* Easy to use and understand
* Provides a simple way to create objects with a subset of properties

Cons:

* Requires an additional library (`radash`), which may introduce overhead
* May not be optimized for performance

**Object destructuring:**

Pros:

* Native JavaScript syntax, no additional libraries required
* Often faster than using a library like `radash`
* Can be more flexible and expressive

Cons:

* Requires manual property selection and variable naming
* Can lead to code that's harder to read and maintain

**Other considerations**

* **Library choice**: The choice of library (e.g., `radash`) can impact performance, readability, and maintainability. In this case, the Radash library is used for simplicity.
* **JavaScript version**: The benchmark does not specify a specific JavaScript version. This could affect the syntax and behavior of object destructuring.

**Library descriptions**

In this benchmark, the `radash` library is used. From its documentation, it appears to provide a simple way to create objects with a subset of properties using the `pick` function. The library is likely optimized for performance, but its exact implementation is not shown in the provided code.

**JavaScript features**

Neither of the benchmarks uses any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's native to the language.

Related benchmarks:

radash pick vs object descturct (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Radash vs Object desctruct

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Radash

Object desctruct

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):