Benchmark: Omit lodash vs plain function

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

function flattenKeys(s) {
    return s.replace(/\[(\w+)\]/g, '.$1').replace(/^\./, '').split('.')
}

var testA = {
    a: {
        b: {
            c: {
                d: [{
                    sample1: 'sample1',
                    sample2: {
                        sample3: {
                            sample4: 'sample4'
                        }
                    }
                }, {
                    otherSample1: 'otherSample1',
                    otherSample2: {
                        otherSample3: {
                            otherSample4: 'otherSample4'
                        }
                    }
                }]
            }
        }
    }
};

function omit3(obj, props) {
    if (typeof props == "string") {
        props = [props];
    }
    if (obj != null && obj != undefined && typeof obj == 'object') {
        const newObj = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)); 
        for (const i in props) {
            const path = flattenKeys(props[i]);
            if (path.length == 1) {
                if (typeof newObj == 'object') {
                    if (Array.isArray(newObj) && newObj?. [props[i]] != null) {
                        newObj?.splice(props[i], 1);
                    } else {
                        delete newObj?. [props[i]];
                    }
                }
            } else if (path.length > 1) {
                if (newObj[path[0]] != null) {
                    newObj[path[0]] = omit3(newObj?. [path[0]], [path.slice(1).join('.')]);
                }
            }
        }
        return newObj;
    }
    return obj;
}
                        
function omit2(obj, props) {
    if (typeof props == "string") {
        props = [props];
    }
    if (obj != null && obj != undefined && typeof obj == 'object') {
         const newObj = structuredClone(obj);
        for (const i in props) {
            const path = flattenKeys(props[i]);
            if (path.length == 1) {
                if (typeof newObj == 'object') {
                    if (Array.isArray(newObj) && newObj?. [props[i]] != null) {
                        newObj?.splice(props[i], 1);
                    } else {
                        delete newObj?. [props[i]];
                    }
                }
            } else if (path.length > 1) {
                if (newObj[path[0]] != null) {
                    newObj[path[0]] = omit2(newObj?. [path[0]], [path.slice(1).join('.')]);
                }
            }
        }
        return newObj;
    }
    return obj;
}

Tests:

lodash omit
const resultA = _.omit(testA, ['a.b.c.d']); const resultB = _.omit(testA, ['a.b.c.d[1].otherSample2.otherSample3']);
plain omit (structuredClone)
const resultA = omit2(testA, ['a.b.c.d']); const resultB = omit2(testA, ['a.b.c.d[1].otherSample2.otherSample3']);
plain omit (JSON.stringify)
const resultA = omit3(testA, ['a.b.c.d']); const resultB = omit3(testA, ['a.b.c.d[1].otherSample2.otherSample3']);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash omit
plain omit (structuredClone)
plain omit (JSON.stringify)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The provided benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to remove specific properties from an object: using Lodash's `omit` function and two alternative plain JavaScript implementations, `omit3` and `omit2`.

**Lodash `omit`**

*   The Lodash `omit` function is used in the first test case.
*   It takes two arguments: the object to modify (`testA`) and an array of property paths to remove.

**Plain JavaScript implementations (omit3 and omit2)**

*   `omit3`:
    *   Uses a recursive approach, where it checks if the current path is an array or an object. If it's an array, it removes the specified element; otherwise, it recursively calls itself with the nested object.
*   `omit2`:
    *   Also uses a recursive approach but employs `structuredClone()` to create a deep copy of the original object before modifying it.

**Comparison and pros/cons**

The three approaches are compared in terms of execution speed. The results indicate that:

*   Lodash's `omit` function is significantly faster than both plain JavaScript implementations.
*   `omit3` and `omit2` have similar performance characteristics, with `omit3` being slightly faster.

**Pros and cons of each approach**

*   **Lodash `omit`**
    *   Pros:
        +   Highly optimized for performance
        +   Easy to use and understand
    *   Cons:
        +   Additional dependency on Lodash library
        +   May not be suitable for situations where a lightweight solution is required
*   **`omit3`**
    *   Pros:
        +   Lightweight solution with no additional dependencies
        +   Simple and easy to understand implementation
    *   Cons:
        +   Performance may not be as good as Lodash's `omit`
        +   Recursive approach can lead to stack overflow for very deep objects
*   **`omit2`**
    +   Pros:
        +   Similar performance characteristics to `omit3`
        +   Uses a lightweight and optimized implementation (`structuredClone`)
    *   Cons:
        +   Additional dependency on the `structuredClone()` function

**Other considerations**

*   The benchmark assumes that the input object is structured in a nested manner, which can impact the performance of the removal process.
*   Other factors like object size, complexity, and data type may also influence the performance of each approach.

In conclusion, while Lodash's `omit` function offers excellent performance, plain JavaScript implementations (`omit3` and `omit2`) can provide a lightweight alternative. However, it is essential to consider the specific requirements and constraints of your project before choosing an implementation.

Related benchmarks:

Omit lodash vs plain function (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash omit vs plain omit (structuredClone) vs plain omit (JSON.stringify)

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash omit

plain omit (structuredClone)

plain omit (JSON.stringify)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):