Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Slice vs Split time benchmark
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Slice vs Split
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = "2016-02-18T23:59:48.039Z"
Tests:
Slice
str.slice(0, 10)
Split
str.split('T')[0]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Slice
Split
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its various aspects. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two string manipulation methods in JavaScript: `slice()` and `split()`. The test cases are: 1. `str.slice(0, 10)`: This method extracts a substring from the original string `str`, starting from index 0 and taking 10 characters. 2. `str.split('T')[0]`: This method splits the string into an array of substrings using the character `'T'` as the delimiter, and then takes the first element of the resulting array. **Comparison Options** The benchmark compares the performance of these two methods in terms of execution time, measured in executions per second. The test is run on a specified script preparation code (`var str = "2016-02-18T23:59:48.039Z"`) and no HTML preparation code is provided. **Pros and Cons** * **`slice()` method:** * Pros: * Typically faster, as it involves a single array indexing operation. * More lightweight, requiring fewer bytes to store the sliced substring. * Cons: * May be less intuitive for developers unfamiliar with this method, as its syntax is different from other string slicing methods in JavaScript (e.g., `.substring()`). * **`split()` method:** * Pros: * More intuitive and widely supported, as it's a standard DOM API method. * Can be used to split strings into arrays of substrings with specific delimiters or regex patterns. * Cons: * May require more bytes to store the resulting array of substrings. * Typically slower than `slice()` due to its multi-step operation. **Library Usage** None **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** None mentioned in this benchmark. However, both methods are part of standard JavaScript and can be used in any modern JavaScript environment without requiring special configuration or libraries. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative string manipulation methods in JavaScript, consider the following: * **`substring()`**: A popular method for slicing strings, but generally slower than `slice()`. * **Regex splitting**: Using the `split()` method with a regex pattern can provide more flexibility and control over splitting strings. * **Array.prototype.slice()**: A similar method to `slice()`, but without creating a new string; instead, it returns an array of sliced substrings. In summary, this benchmark provides a comparison of two common JavaScript methods for string manipulation: `slice()` and `split()`. The results indicate that the `slice()` method is typically faster and more lightweight than the `split()` method.
Related benchmarks:
slice vs substring remove last char
ISO Date parsing split vs slice
JS: split vs slice
Performance Test: substring vs substr vs slice vs split for date
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?